ArticleMedical physics2016
Quantification of breast lesion compositions using low-dose spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
Article in Medical physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe positive predictive power for malignancy can potentially be improved, if the chemical compositions of suspicious breast lesions can be reliably measured in screening mammography. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of quantifying breast lesion composition, in terms of water and lipid contents, with spectral mammography.
methodsPhantom and tissue samples were imaged with a spectral mammography system based on silicon-strip photon-counting detectors. Dual-energy calibration was performed for material decomposition, using plastic water and adipose-equivalent phantoms as the basis materials. The step wedge calibration phantom consisted of 20 calibration configurations, which ranged from 2 to 8 cm in thickness and from 0% to 100% in plastic water density. A nonlinear rational fitting function was used in dual-energy calibration of the imaging system. Breast lesion phantoms, made from various combinations of plastic water and adipose-equivalent disks, were embedded in a breast mammography phantom with a heterogeneous background pattern. Lesion phantoms with water densities ranging from 0% to 100% were placed at different locations of the heterogeneous background phantom. The water density in the lesion phantoms was measured using dual-energy material decomposition. The thickness and density of the background phantom were varied to test the accuracy of the decomposition technique in different configurations. In addition, an in vitro study was also performed using mixtures of lean and fat bovine tissue of 25%, 50%, and 80% lean weight percentages as the background. Lesions were simulated by using breast lesion phantoms, as well as small bovine tissue samples, composed of carefully weighed lean and fat bovine tissues. The water densities in tissue samples were measured using spectral mammography and compared to measurement using chemical decomposition of the tissue.
resultsThe thickness of measured and known water contents was compared for various lesion configurations. There was a good linear correlation between the measured and the known values. The root-mean-square errors in water thickness measurements were 0.3 and 0.2 mm for the plastic phantom and bovine tissue backgrounds, respectively.
conclusionsThe results indicate that spectral mammography can be used to accurately characterize breast lesion composition in terms of their equivalent water and lipid contents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.