Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27782189›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Molecular phylogeny of Polyneoptera (Insecta) inferred from expanded mitogenomic data.

Nan Song, Hu Li, Fan Song, Wanzhi Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two ground crickets,Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nan SongCollege of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hu LiDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Fan SongDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Wanzhi CaiDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Polyneoptera represents one of the earliest insect radiations, comprising the majority of hemimetabolous orders, in which many species have great economic importance. Here, we sequenced eleven mitochondrial genomes of the polyneopteran insects by using high throughput pooled sequencing technology, and presented a phylogenetic reconstruction for this group based on expanded mitochondrial genome data. Our analyses included 189 taxa, of which 139 species represent all the major polyneopteran lineages. Multiple results support the monophyly of Polyneoptera, the monophyly of Dictyoptera, and the monophyly of Orthoptera. Sister taxon relationships Plecoptera + Dermaptera, and Zoraptera + Embioptera are also supported by most analyses. Within Dictyoptera, the Blattodea is consistently retrieved as paraphyly due to the sister group relationship of Cryptocercus with Isoptera. In addition, the results demonstrate that model selection, data treatment, and outgroup choice can have significant effects on the reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of Polyneoptera.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialAnimalsBase SequenceBayes TheoremCytochromes bDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IVNeopteraPhylogenySequence AlignmentCytochromes bDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IV

Identifiers

PMID27782189
PMCPMC5080581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.