Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27782168›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Fluorescent protein tagging of endogenous protein in brain neurons using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in and in utero electroporation techniques.

Takeshi Uemura, Takuma Mori, Taiga Kurihara, Shiori Kawase, Rie Koike, Michiru Satoga, Xueshan Cao, Xue Li, Toru Yanagawa, Takayuki Sakurai and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CRISPR/Cas-Dependent and Nuclease-FreeHuman gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takeshi UemuraDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute of Medicine, Academic Assembly, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Takuma MoriDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute of Medicine, Academic Assembly, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Taiga KuriharaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute of Medicine, Academic Assembly, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Shiori KawaseDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute of Medicine, Academic Assembly, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Rie KoikeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute of Medicine, Academic Assembly, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Michiru SatogaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute of Medicine, Academic Assembly, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Xueshan CaoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute of Medicine, Academic Assembly, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Xue LiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute of Medicine, Academic Assembly, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Toru YanagawaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Takayuki SakuraiDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Shinshu University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Takayuki ShindoDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Shinshu University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Katsuhiko TabuchiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Institute of Medicine, Academic Assembly, Shinshu University, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Shinshu University · JPJapan Science and Technology Agency · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing is a powerful technique for studying gene functions. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knock-in has recently been applied to various cells and organisms. Here, we successfully knocked in an EGFP coding sequence at the site immediately after the first ATG codon of the β-actin gene in neurons in the brain by the combined use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system and in utero electroporation technique, resulting in the expression of the EGFP-tagged β-actin protein in cortical layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons. We detected EGFP fluorescence signals in the soma and neurites of EGFP knock-in neurons. These signals were particularly abundant in the head of dendritic spines, corresponding to the localization of the endogenous β-actin protein. EGFP knock-in neurons showed no detectable changes in spine density and basic electrophysiological properties. In contrast, exogenously overexpressed EGFP-β-actin showed increased spine density and EPSC frequency, and changed resting membrane potential. Thus, our technique provides a potential tool to elucidate the localization of various endogenous proteins in neurons by epitope tagging without altering neuronal and synaptic functions. This technique can be also useful for introducing a specific mutation into genes to study the function of proteins and genomic elements in brain neurons.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsBrainCRISPR-Cas SystemsElectroporationFemaleGene ExpressionGene Knock-In TechniquesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred ICRMice, TransgenicNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsPregnancyRecombinant Fusion ProteinsActinsenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID27782168
PMCPMC5080626
OpenAlexW2542848066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.