Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27782041›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Neonicotinoid Insecticides Alter the Gene Expression Profile of Neuron-Enriched Cultures from Neonatal Rat Cerebellum.

Junko Kimura-Kuroda, Yasumasa Nishito, Hiroko Yanagisawa, Yoichiro Kuroda, Yukari Komuta, Hitoshi Kawano, Masaharu Hayashi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junko Kimura-KurodaDepartment of Brain Development and Neural Regeneration, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan. J.KKURO.582@gmail.com.
Yasumasa NishitoCenter for Basic Technology Research, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan. nishito-ys@igakuken.or.jp.
Hiroko YanagisawaAdvanced Clinical Research Center, Institute of Neurological Disorders, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 215-0026, Japan. hiro-yanagisawa@jikei.ac.jp.
Yoichiro KurodaEnvironmental Neuroscience Information Center, Musashino, Tokyo 180-0014, Japan. yo-kuroda@nifty.com.
Yukari KomutaDivision of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-8513, Japan. con376@ndmc.ac.jp.
Hitoshi KawanoDepartment of Health & Dietetics, Teikyo Heisei University, Toshima-ku, Tokyo 170-8445, Japan. kawano.hitoshi3@gmail.com.
Masaharu HayashiDepartment of Brain Development and Neural Regeneration, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan. hayashi-ms@igakuken.or.jp.
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPTeikyo Heisei University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonicotinoids are considered safe because of their low affinities to mammalian nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) relative to insect nAChRs. However, because of importance of nAChRs in mammalian brain development, there remains a need to establish the safety of chronic neonicotinoid exposures with regards to children's health. Here we examined the effects of longterm (14 days) and low dose (1 μM) exposure of neuron-enriched cultures from neonatal rat cerebellum to nicotine and two neonicotinoids: acetamiprid and imidacloprid. Immunocytochemistry revealed no differences in the number or morphology of immature neurons or glial cells in any group versus untreated control cultures. However, a slight disturbance in Purkinje cell dendritic arborization was observed in the exposed cultures. Next we performed transcriptome analysis on total RNAs using microarrays, and identified significant differential expression (p < 0.05, q < 0.05, ≥1.5 fold) between control cultures versus nicotine-, acetamiprid-, or imidacloprid-exposed cultures in 34, 48, and 67 genes, respectively. Common to all exposed groups were nine genes essential for neurodevelopment, suggesting that chronic neonicotinoid exposure alters the transcriptome of the developing mammalian brain in a similar way to nicotine exposure. Our results highlight the need for further careful investigations into the effects of neonicotinoids in the developing mammalian brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebellumGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalImidazolesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNeuronsNicotineNitro CompoundsPyridinesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, NicotinicTranscriptomeacetamipridimidaclopridImidazolesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNicotineNitro CompoundsPyridinesReceptors, Nicotinicacetamipridbrain developmentcerebellar culturedevelopmental neurotoxicityimidaclopridmicroarrayneonicotinoidpesticidetranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27782041
PMCPMC5086726
OpenAlexW2529715182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.