Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27781667›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2017

Peripheral snap-fit locking mechanisms and smooth surface finish of tibial trays reduce backside wear in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Łukasz Łapaj, Adrian Mróz, Paweł Kokoszka, Jacek Markuszewski, Justyna Wendland, Celina Helak-Łapaj, Jacek Kruczyński

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Łukasz Łapaja Department of General Orthopaedics, Musculoskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery , Poznań University of Medical Sciences.
Adrian Mrózb Metal Forming Institute.
Paweł Kokoszkaa Department of General Orthopaedics, Musculoskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery , Poznań University of Medical Sciences.
Jacek Markuszewskia Department of General Orthopaedics, Musculoskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery , Poznań University of Medical Sciences.
Justyna Wendlanda Department of General Orthopaedics, Musculoskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery , Poznań University of Medical Sciences.
Celina Helak-Łapajc Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology , Poznań University of Medical Sciences.
Jacek Kruczyńskia Department of General Orthopaedics, Musculoskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery , Poznań University of Medical Sciences.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLŁukasiewicz Research Network - Metal Forming Institute · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - Severe backside wear, observed in older generations of total knee replacements (TKRs), led to redesign of locking mechanisms to reduce micromotions between tibial tray and inlay. Since little is known about whether this effectively reduces backside wear in modern designs, we examined backside damage in retrievals of various contemporary fixed-bearing TKRs. Patients and methods - A consecutive series of 102 inlays with a peripheral (Stryker Triathlon, Stryker Scorpio, DePuy PFC Sigma, Aesculap Search Evolution) or dovetail locking mechanism (Zimmer NexGen, Smith and Nephew Genesis II) was examined. Articular and backside surface damage was evaluated using the semiquantitative Hood scale. Inlays were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to determine backside wear mechanisms. Results - Mean Hood scores for articular (A) and backside (B) surfaces were similar in most implants-Triathlon (A: 46, B: 22), Genesis II (A: 55, B: 24), Scorpio (A: 57, B: 24), PFC (A: 52, B: 20); Search (A: 56, B: 24)-except the NexGen knee (A: 57, B: 60), which had statistically significantly higher backside wear scores. SEM studies showed backside damage caused by abrasion related to micromotion in designs with dovetail locking mechanisms, especially in the unpolished NexGen trays. In implants with peripheral liner locking mechanism, there were no signs of micromotion or abrasion. Instead, "tray transfer" of polyethylene and flattening of machining was observed. Interpretation - Although this retrieval study may not represent well-functioning TKRs, we found that a smooth surface finish and a peripheral locking mechanism reduce backside wear in vivo, but further studies are required to determine whether this actually leads to reduced osteolysis and lower failure rates.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisPolyethyleneAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointMalePrognosisProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureReoperationRetrospective StudiesSurface PropertiesPolyethylene

Identifiers

PMID27781667
PMCPMC5251266
OpenAlexW2542145291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.