Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27781499›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

A quantitative study of shape descriptors from glioblastoma multiforme phenotypes for predicting survival outcome.

Ahmad Chaddad, Christian Desrosiers, Lama Hassan, Camel Tanougast

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Individualized Treatment Effect Inference of Head and Neck Cancer with Multimodal Data.APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Treatment-wise Glioblastoma Survival Inference with Multi-parametric Preoperative MRI.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Journal of international medical research · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmad Chaddad1 Laboratory for Imagery, Vision and Artificial Intelligence, University of Québec, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Christian Desrosiers1 Laboratory for Imagery, Vision and Artificial Intelligence, University of Québec, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Lama Hassan1 Laboratory for Imagery, Vision and Artificial Intelligence, University of Québec, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Camel Tanougast2 Laboratory of Conception, Optimization and Modeling of Systems, University of Lorraine, Metz, Lorraine, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePredicting the survival outcome of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is of key importance to clinicians for selecting the optimal course of treatment. The goal of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of geometric shape features, extracted from MR images, as a potential non-invasive way to characterize GBM tumours and predict the overall survival times of patients with GBM.

methodsThe data of 40 patients with GBM were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas and Cancer Imaging Archive. The T

resultsOur analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test showed that all but one shape feature had statistically significant differences across phenotypes, with p-value < 0.05, following Holm-Bonferroni correction, justifying the analysis of GBM tumour shapes on a per-phenotype basis. Furthermore, the survival analysis based on the Kaplan-Meier estimator identified three features derived from necrotic regions (i.e. Eccentricity, Extent and Solidity) that were significantly correlated with overall survival (corrected p-value < 0.05; hazard ratios between 1.68 and 1.87). In the multivariate analysis, features from necrotic regions gave the highest accuracy in predicting the survival group of patients, with a mean area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 63.85%. Combining the features of all three phenotypes increased the mean AUC to 66.99%, suggesting that shape features from different phenotypes can be used in a synergic manner to predict GBM survival.

conclusionResults show that shape features, in particular those extracted from necrotic regions, can be used effectively to characterize GBM tumours and predict the overall survival of patients with GBM. Advances in knowledge: Simple volumetric features have been largely used to characterize the different phenotypes of a GBM tumour (i.e. active tumour, oedema and necrosis). This study extends previous work by considering a wide range of shape features, extracted in different phenotypes, for the prediction of survival in patients with GBM.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBrainBrain NeoplasmsEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID27781499
PMCPMC5604924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.