ArticleThe British journal of radiology2017
Big Data in radiation therapy: challenges and opportunities.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Privacy-Preserving Distributed Machine Learning From Federated Databases in Health Care.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Pooled it
- KaSARi: a national framework for standardized, automated, and predictive radiotherapy in Finland.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Imaging Biomarkers in Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Current AI technologies in cancer diagnostics and treatment.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Operationalizing and digitizing person-centered daily functioning: a case for functionomics.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Colorectal cancer health and care quality indicators in a federated setting using the Personal Health Train.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Automatic Liver Segmentation in CT Images with Enhanced GAN and Mask Region-Based CNN Architectures.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Meeting the Challenge of Scientific Dissemination in the Era of COVID-19: Toward a Modular Approach to Knowledge-Sharing for Radiation Oncology.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020Article
- Application of Radiomics for the Prediction of Radiation-Induced Toxicity in the IMRT Era: Current State-of-the-Art.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology.The British journal of radiology · 2019Review
- Decision Support Systems in Oncology.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2019Review
- A review on radiomics and the future of theranostics for patient selection in precision medicine.The British journal of radiology · 2018Review
- Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data collected and generated by radiation oncology can be classified by the Volume, Variety, Velocity and Veracity (4Vs) of Big Data because they are spread across different care providers and not easily shared owing to patient privacy protection. The magnitude of the 4Vs is substantial in oncology, especially owing to imaging modalities and unclear data definitions. To create useful models ideally all data of all care providers are understood and learned from; however, this presents challenges in the guise of poor data quality, patient privacy concerns, geographical spread, interoperability and large volume. In radiation oncology, there are many efforts to collect data for research and innovation purposes. Clinical trials are the gold standard when proving any hypothesis that directly affects the patient. Collecting data in registries with strict predefined rules is also a common approach to find answers. A third approach is to develop data stores that can be used by modern machine learning techniques to provide new insights or answer hypotheses. We believe all three approaches have their strengths and weaknesses, but they should all strive to create Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) data. To learn from these data, we need distributed learning techniques, sending machine learning algorithms to FAIR data stores around the world, learning from trial data, registries and routine clinical data rather than trying to centralize all data. To improve and personalize medicine, rapid learning platforms must be able to process FAIR "Big Data" to evaluate current clinical practice and to guide further innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.