Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27781151›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2016

Dose-dependent short- and long-term effects of ionizing irradiation on neural stem cells in murine hippocampal tissue cultures: neuroprotective potential of resveratrol.

Isabell Prager, Ina Patties, Katrin Himmelbach, Eva Kendzia, Felicitas Merz, Klaus Müller, Rolf-Dieter Kortmann, Annegret Glasow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabell PragerDepartment of Radiation Therapy University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Ina PattiesDepartment of Radiation Therapy University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Katrin HimmelbachDepartment of Radiation Therapy University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Eva KendziaDepartment of Radiation Therapy University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Felicitas MerzInstitute of Anatomy University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Klaus MüllerDepartment of Radiation Therapy University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Rolf-Dieter KortmannDepartment of Radiation Therapy University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Annegret GlasowDepartment of Radiation Therapy University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Leipzig University · DELeipzig University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadiation therapy plays an essential role in the treatment of brain tumors, but neurocognitive deficits remain a significant risk, especially in pediatric patients. In recent trials, hippocampal sparing techniques are applied to reduce these adverse effects. Here, we investigate dose-dependent effects of ionizing radiation (IR) on juvenile hippocampal neurogenesis. Additionally, we evaluate the radioprotective potential of resveratrol, a plant polyphenol recognized for its bifunctional tumor-preventive and anticancer effects.

methodsOrganotypic entorhinal-hippocampal slice cultures from transgenic nestin-CFPnuc C57BL/J6 mice, postnatal days 3-6, were irradiated on a X-ray machine (4.5, 8, 12, and 16 Gy, single doses) after about 2 weeks. Nestin-positive neural stem cells were counted at a confocal live imaging microscope 0, 2, 4, 14, 25, and 42 days after IR. Resveratrol (15 μmol/L) was added 2 hr before and 24 hr after IR. Proliferation and cell death were assessed by BrdU pulse label, 48 hr after and by propidium iodide staining 96 hr after IR. GFAP- and NeuN-positive cells were counted 42 days after IR in cryosectioned immunofluorescence-stained slices.

resultsThe observed age-related changes of nestin-positive stem cells in the organotypic slice culture model resembled the reduction of neural stem cells in vivo. IR (4.5-16 Gy) led to a dose-dependent damage of the neural stem cell pool in the dentate gyrus. No recovery was seen within 42 days after doses from 4.5 Gy onward. The decline of nestin-positive cells was paralleled by increased cell death and decreased proliferation. The number of GFAP-positive cells was significantly enhanced. No significant change was detected in the overall NeuN-positive cell population, whereas the number of newborn, NeuN/BrdU double-positive neurons was reduced. Resveratrol treatment reversed the irradiation-induced decline of neural stem cells.

conclusionThe neuroprotective action of resveratrol on irradiated hippocampal tissue warrants further investigation as a possible supplement to hippocampal sparing procedures.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DeathCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHippocampusMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ConfocalNestinNeural Stem CellsNeurogliaNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsRadiation Injuries, ExperimentalRadiation, IonizingNes protein, mouseNestinNeuroprotective AgentsRadiation-Protective AgentsResveratrolStilbeneshippocampusionizing radiationnestinorganotypic slicesresveratrol

Identifiers

PMID27781151
PMCPMC5064349
OpenAlexW2518079202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.