Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27781148›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2016

Functional neuroimaging of visual creativity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura M Pidgeon, Madeleine Grealy, Alex H B Duffy, Laura Hay, Chris McTeague, Tijana Vuletic, Damien Coyle, Sam J Gilbert

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura M PidgeonSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK; Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7216-1434
Madeleine GrealySchool of Psychological Sciences and Health University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK.
Alex H B DuffyDepartment of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK.
Laura HayDepartment of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK.
Chris McTeagueSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK; Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK.
Tijana VuleticSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK; Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK.
Damien CoyleIntelligent Systems Research Centre University of Ulster Derry Northern Ireland.
Sam J GilbertInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience University College London London UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe generation of creative visual imagery contributes to technological and scientific innovation and production of visual art. The underlying cognitive and neural processes are, however, poorly understood.

methodsThis review synthesizes functional neuroimaging studies of visual creativity. Seven functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and 19 electroencephalography (EEG) studies were included, comprising 27 experiments and around 800 participants.

resultsActivation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of the fMRI studies comparing visual creativity to non-rest control tasks yielded significant clusters in thalamus, left fusiform gyrus, and right middle and inferior frontal gyri. The EEG studies revealed a tendency for decreased alpha power during visual creativity compared to baseline, but comparisons of visual creativity to non-rest control tasks revealed inconsistent findings.

conclusionsThe findings are consistent with suggested contributions to visual creativity of prefrontally mediated inhibition, evaluation, and working memory, as well as visual imagery processes. Findings are discussed in relation to prominent theories of the neural basis of creativity.

Indexed as

CreativityBrainFunctional NeuroimagingHumansImaginationVisual Perceptioncreative cognitioncreative ideationelectroencephalographyfunctional magnetic resonance imagingidea generationideationvisual creativityvisual designvisual imagery

Identifiers

PMID27781148
PMCPMC5064346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.