Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27781141›Full record

ReviewBrain and behavior2016

Characterizing neurocognitive impairment in young people with major depression: state, trait, or scar?

Kelly Allott, Caroline A Fisher, Gunther Paul Amminger, Joanne Goodall, Sarah Hetrick

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. The validation of a new online cognitive assessment tool: The MyCognition Quotient.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2019
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Executive Dysfunction and Depression Risk in Adolescence: Functional-MRI Analysis of Transient Network States During a Working Memory Task.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The correlation between high temperature and cognitive function: a CHARLS 2018 cross-sectional study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly AllottOrygenThe National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health Parkville Victoria Australia; The Centre for Youth Mental Health The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia.
Caroline A FisherThe Melbourne Clinic Richmond Melbourne Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Melbourne Australia.
Gunther Paul AmmingerOrygenThe National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health Parkville Victoria Australia; The Centre for Youth Mental Health The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia.
Joanne GoodallOrygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health Parkville Victoria Australia.
Sarah HetrickOrygenThe National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health Parkville Victoria Australia; The Centre for Youth Mental Health The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia.
Orygen Youth Health · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUMelbourne Clinic · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) affects a quarter of adolescents and young adults and is associated with the greatest global burden of disease in this population. There is a growing literature, mostly in adults, showing that significant neurocognitive impairments are common in MDD. It remains unclear whether these impairments are pre-existing trait markers of MDD, state-related impairments that fluctuate with depressive symptoms, or 'scar' impairments that worsen with illness progression. The aim of this study is to provide a conceptual framework for understanding MDD and neurocognitive impairment in adolescence and young adulthood (ages 12-25 years).

methodExamination of the evidence for neurocognitive deficits as trait, state, and scar features of MDD according to different study designs (family studies, premorbid studies, current depression, remitted depression, and longitudinal studies with repeated assessment) was conducted.

resultsThe few premorbid and family studies conducted in youth provide equivocal evidence for neurocognitive impairments as trait markers of MDD. The presence of state-based neurocognitive impairment remains unclear as evidence comes mostly from cross-sectional studies. There are a limited, but growing number of longitudinal studies with repeated neurocognitive assessment in youth. Studies that examined neurocognition prior to the onset of MDD and with long-term follow-up provide tentative evidence for neurocognitive scarring.

conclusionNeurocognitive impairment is a feature of MDD in adolescents and young adults. To better understand the nature, timing, and pattern of impairment, longitudinal studies that examine neurocognition before and after the development of full-threshold MDD, including following recurrence are needed. This knowledge will have important implications for mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of MDD in youth.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildCognitive DysfunctionHumansMajor Depressive DisorderYoung Adultadolescencecognitiondeficitsearly interventionmajor depressive disorderneuropsychologicalyoung adulthoodyouth

Identifiers

PMID27781141
PMCPMC5064339
OpenAlexW2477909947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.