Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27781133›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2016

Hippocampal lipid differences in Alzheimer's disease: a human brain study using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-imaging mass spectrometry.

Lakshini H S Mendis, Angus C Grey, Richard L M Faull, Maurice A Curtis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Amylin antibodies frequently display cross-reactivity with CGRP: characterization of eight amylin antibodies.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lakshini H S MendisCentre for Brain Research Faculty of Medical and Health Science University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand; Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging Faculty of Medical and Health Science University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1984-5954
Angus C GreyCentre for Brain Research Faculty of Medical and Health Science University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand; Department of Physiology Faculty of Medical and Health Science University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.
Richard L M FaullCentre for Brain Research Faculty of Medical and Health Science University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand; Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging Faculty of Medical and Health Science University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.
Maurice A CurtisCentre for Brain Research Faculty of Medical and Health Science University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand; Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging Faculty of Medical and Health Science University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia, is pathologically characterized by β-amyloid plaques and tau tangles. However, there is also evidence of lipid dyshomeostasis-mediated AD pathology. Given the structural diversity of lipids, mass spectrometry is a useful tool for studying lipid changes in AD. Although there have been a few studies investigating lipid changes in the human hippocampus in particular, there are few reports on how lipids change in each hippocampal subfield (e.g., Cornu Ammonis [CA] 1-4, dentate gyrus [DG] etc.). Since each subfield has its own function, we postulated that there could be lipid changes that are unique to each.

methodsWe used matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-imaging mass spectrometry to investigate specific lipid changes in each subfield in AD. Data from the hippocampus region of six age- and gender-matched normal and AD pairs were analyzed with SCiLS lab 2015b software (SCiLS GmbH, Germany; RRID:SCR_014426), using an analysis workflow developed in-house. Hematoxylin, eosin, and luxol fast blue staining were used to precisely delineate each anatomical hippocampal subfield. Putative lipid identities, which were consistent with published data, were assigned using MS/MS.

resultsBoth positively and negatively charged lipid ion species were abundantly detected in normal and AD tissue. While the distribution pattern of lipids did not change in AD, the abundance of some lipids changed, consistent with trends that have been previously reported. However, our results indicated that the majority of these lipid changes specifically occur in the CA1 region. Additionally, there were many lipid changes that were specific to the DG.

conclusionsMatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-imaging mass spectrometry and our analysis workflow provide a novel method to investigate specific lipid changes in hippocampal subfields. Future work will focus on elucidating the role that specific lipid differences in each subfield play in AD pathogenesis.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseFemaleGray MatterHippocampusHumansLipidsMaleMiddle AgedSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationWhite MatterLipidsCornu Ammonisdentate gyrushuman brainneurosciencereceiver‐operator characteristic analysis

Identifiers

PMID27781133
PMCPMC5064331
OpenAlexW2474978257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.