ArticleJournal of virus eradication2016
How can we achieve universal access to low-cost treatment for HIV?
Article in Journal of virus eradication, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value-based prices of emerging disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease in 174 countries: a cost-effectiveness and threshold analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Impact of generic antiretroviral drugs introduction on pharmaceutical expenditure patterns in the Netherlands: a six-year retrospective database analysis from 2016 to 2022.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Benefits of INSTI-Based Regimens in a Real-World Setting of People Living With HIV-1 in Colombia.International journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Reimagining global health systems for the 21st century: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- "Accessibility": A new narrative of healthcare services for people living with HIV in the capital city of Indonesia.Belitung nursing journal · 2021Article
- InterPrEP. Internet-based pre-exposure prophylaxis with generic tenofovir DF/emtricitabine in London: an analysis of outcomes in 641 patients.Journal of virus eradication · 2017Article
- Proposal of pharmacophore model for HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors: Combined mutational effect analysis, molecular dynamics, molecular docking and pharmacophore modeling study.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass production of low-cost antiretrovirals (ARVs) has already allowed over 17 million individuals to access treatment for HIV infection, mainly in low-income countries. It is possible to manufacture combination ARVs for $110 per person-year, using tenofovir (TDF), lamivudine (3TC) and efavirenz (EFV). New combinations of ARVs costing as little as $60 per person-year will be available in the near future. Pre-exposure prophylaxis using TDF in combination with either 3TC or emtricitabine (FTC) could also be provided for less than $90 per person-year. Voluntary licensing allows people in the poorest countries to access new ARVs at prices close to manufacturing costs. Patents on several key ARVs will expire by 2018 and should allow worldwide access to high-quality, low-cost triple combination therapy, such as TDF/3TC/EFV. Several protease inhibitors will also become available as generics by 2018. However, ongoing patent restrictions will lead to sustained high prices for the most recently developed ARVs in most middle- and high-income countries. These include the nucleotide tenofovir alafenamide, the integrase strand inhibitor dolutegravir and several single combination tablet regimens. We suggest that as patents for ARVs expire, health authorities first need to rapidly import and introduce generic versions of drugs such as abacavir, 3TC, EFV and TDF. Once these low prices have been established for these generics, cost-effectiveness of patented ARVs needs to be re-evaluated. It may no longer be justified to pay high prices for these drugs. A strategy of low-cost generic ARVs for most people, with higher-cost patented alternatives used as switch options, could allow for an increased number of people to receive ARVs in the context of fixed health budgets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27781100PMC5075345W2547199545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.