Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27780989›Full record

ArticleAnnals of neurosciences2016

Exploring the Effect of

Md Sahab Uddin, Abdullah Al Mamun, Md Sarwar Hossain, Farjana Akter, Mohammed Ashraful Iqbal, Md Asaduzzaman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Evaluating the Hepatoprotective Effect ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Phyto-pharmacological Potential ofRecent advances in food, nutrition & agriculture · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Functional and Nutraceutical Significance of Amla (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Md Sahab UddinDepartment of Pharmacy, Southeast University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abdullah Al MamunDepartment of Pharmacy, Southeast University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Sarwar HossainDepartment of Pharmacy, State University of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Farjana AkterDepartment of Pharmacy, State University of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammed Ashraful IqbalDepartment of Chemistry, Fareast International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md AsaduzzamanDepartment of Pharmacy, Southeast University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Southeast University · BDState University of Bangladesh · BDDaffodil International University · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases are incurable and debilitating conditions that result in the progressive degeneration of nerve cells, which affect the cognitive activity. Currently, as a result of multiple studies linking Alzheimer's disease (AD) to oxidative damage, the uses of natural antioxidant to prevent, delay, or enhance the pathological changes underlying the progression of AD has received considerable attention. Therefore, this study was aimed at examining the effect of ethanolic extracts of

Indexed as

AcetylcholinesteraseAlzheimer's diseaseBrain antioxidant markersCognitive performancePhyllanthus emblica

Identifiers

PMID27780989
PMCPMC5075744
OpenAlexW2544993155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.