Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27780826›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2018

A graphical model approach visualizes regulatory relationships between genome-wide transcription factor binding profiles.

Felicia S L Ng, David Ruau, Lorenz Wernisch, Berthold Göttgens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felicia S L Ng
David Ruau
Lorenz Wernisch
Berthold Göttgens
Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilCancer Research UK 12765Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated analysis of multiple genome-wide transcription factor (TF)-binding profiles will be vital to advance our understanding of the global impact of TF binding. However, existing methods for measuring similarity in large numbers of chromatin immunoprecipitation assays with sequencing (ChIP-seq), such as correlation, mutual information or enrichment analysis, are limited in their ability to display functionally relevant TF relationships. In this study, we propose the use of graphical models to determine conditional independence between TFs and showed that network visualization provides a promising alternative to distinguish 'direct' versus 'indirect' TF interactions. We applied four algorithms to measure 'direct' dependence to a compendium of 367 mouse haematopoietic TF ChIP-seq samples and obtained a consensus network known as a 'TF association network' where edges in the network corresponded to likely causal pairwise relationships between TFs. The 'TF association network' illustrates the role of TFs in developmental pathways, is reminiscent of combinatorial TF regulation, corresponds to known protein-protein interactions and indicates substantial TF-binding reorganization in leukemic cell types. With the rapid increase in TF ChIP-Seq data sets, the approach presented here will be a powerful tool to study transcriptional programmes across a wide range of biological systems.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsGene Expression RegulationGenomeAlgorithmsAnimalsBinding SitesCells, CulturedChromatin ImmunoprecipitationComputational BiologyHematopoietic Stem CellsLeukemiaMiceModels, StatisticalProtein BindingTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsChIP-seqhaematopoiesisnetworktranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID27780826
PMCPMC5496675
OpenAlexW2537301065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.