Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27780720›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2017

Unilateral olfactory sensitivity in multiple sclerosis.

Kimberley P Good, Isabelle A Tourbier, Paul Moberg, Jennifer L Cuzzocreo, Rena J Geckle, David M Yousem, Dzung L Pham, Richard L Doty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kimberley P GoodDepartment of Psychiatry and Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Isabelle A TourbierSmell and Taste Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Department of Otorhinolarynology: Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Paul MobergSmell and Taste Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Department of Otorhinolarynology: Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Jennifer L CuzzocreoDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Rena J GeckleDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.
David M YousemDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Dzung L PhamCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Henry Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Richard L DotySmell and Taste Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Department of Otorhinolarynology: Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: richard.doty@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

OLFACTION IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSISR01DC002974 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOTY, RICHARD L · 1997 to 2001
$468k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is not known whether lateralized olfactory sensitivity deficits are present in MS. Since projections from the olfactory bulb to the olfactory cortex are largely ipsilateral, and since both functional imaging and psychophysical studies suggest that the right side of the brain may be more involved in olfactory processing than the left, we addressed this issue by administering well-validated tests of odor detection, along with tests of odor identification, to each side of the nose of 73 MS patients and 73 age-, gender-, and race-matched normal controls. We also determined, in 63 of the MS patients, whether correlations were present between the olfactory test measures and MRI-determined lesions in brain regions ipsilateral and contralateral to the nose side that was tested. No significant left:right differences in either olfactory sensitivity or identification were present, although in both cases mean performance was lower in the MS than in the control subjects (ps<0.0001). Scores on the two sides of the nose were positively correlated with one another (threshold r=0.56, p<0.0001; Identification r=0.71, p<0.0001). The percent of MS patients whose bilateral test scores fell below the 10th percentile of controls did not differ between the odor identification and detection threshold tests. Both left and right odor identification and detection test scores were weakly correlated with lesion volumes in temporal and frontal lobe brain regions (r's<0.40). Our findings demonstrate that MS does not differentially influence odor perception on left and right sides of the nose, regardless of whether sensitivity or identification is being measured. They also indicate that tests of odor identification and detection are similarly influenced by MS and that such influences are associated with central brain lesions.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisNeuropsychological TestsOdorantsOlfaction DisordersSensory ThresholdsBrain lateralityMagnetic resonance imagingMultiple sclerosisOlfactionSex differencesThresholdUPSIT

Identifiers

PMID27780720
PMCPMC5135634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.