Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27780207›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2016

Visual BOLD Response in Late Blind Subjects with Argus II Retinal Prosthesis.

E Castaldi, G M Cicchini, L Cinelli, L Biagi, S Rizzo, M C Morrone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Analysis of Electric Field Stimulation in Blue Light Stressed 661W Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

E CastaldiDepartment of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
G M CicchiniCNR Neuroscience Institute, Pisa, Italy.
L CinelliAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, SOD Oculistica, Florence, Italy.
L BiagiStella Maris Scientific Institute, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2159-439X
S RizzoAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, SOD Oculistica, Florence, Italy.
M C MorroneDepartment of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITFondazione Stella Maris · ITNeuroscience Institute · IT

Funding

European Research Council 338866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal prosthesis technologies require that the visual system downstream of the retinal circuitry be capable of transmitting and elaborating visual signals. We studied the capability of plastic remodeling in late blind subjects implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis with psychophysics and functional MRI (fMRI). After surgery, six out of seven retinitis pigmentosa (RP) blind subjects were able to detect high-contrast stimuli using the prosthetic implant. However, direction discrimination to contrast modulated stimuli remained at chance level in all of them. No subject showed any improvement of contrast sensitivity in either eye when not using the Argus II. Before the implant, the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) activity in V1 and the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) was very weak or absent. Surprisingly, after prolonged use of Argus II, BOLD responses to visual input were enhanced. This is, to our knowledge, the first study tracking the neural changes of visual areas in patients after retinal implant, revealing a capacity to respond to restored visual input even after years of deprivation.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityVisual ProsthesisBlindnessGeniculate BodiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetinitis Pigmentosa

Identifiers

PMID27780207
PMCPMC5079588
OpenAlexW2534549821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.