Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27780197›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2016

Prophylactic Oral Dextrose Gel for Newborn Babies at Risk of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Randomised Controlled Dose-Finding Trial (the Pre-hPOD Study).

Joanne Elizabeth Hegarty, Jane Elizabeth Harding, Gregory David Gamble, Caroline Anne Crowther, Richard Edlin, Jane Marie Alsweiler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04185766 (Use of Oral 40% Destrogel to Prevent Hypoglycaemia in Late-term Births and SGA or LGA Term Newborns), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04185766 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Use of Oral 40% Destrogel to Prevent Hypoglycaemia in Late-term Births and SGA or LGA Term Newborns

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto OspedalieroRan2018 to 2019Enrolled172ConditionsHypoglycaemia NeonatalArmsAdministration of a placebo solution (0.5 ml / kg), Administration of a placebo solution (1 ml / kg), Administration of 40% glucose in gel (0.5 ml / Kg), Administration of 40% glucose in gel 1 ml / Kg)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Oral dextrose gel to prevent hypoglycaemia in at-risk neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Oral dextrose gel to prevent hypoglycaemia in at-risk neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Two-year outcomes after dextrose gel prophylaxis for neonatal hypoglycaemia.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2021
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Glucose Gel as a Potential Alternative Treatment to Infant Formula for Neonatal Hypoglycaemia in Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. [Management of hyperglycemia in pregnancy (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Methodological flaws in a meta-analysis compromise the integrity of the evidence.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Oral dextrose gel for hypoglycemia in a well-baby nursery: a baby-friendly initiative.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanne Elizabeth HegartyLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jane Elizabeth HardingLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Gregory David GambleLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Caroline Anne CrowtherLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Richard EdlinSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jane Marie AlsweilerLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal hypoglycaemia is common, affecting up to 15% of newborns, and can cause brain damage. Currently, there are no strategies, beyond early feeding, to prevent neonatal hypoglycaemia. Our aim was to determine a dose of 40% oral dextrose gel that will prevent neonatal hypoglycaemia in newborn babies at risk. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding trial of buccal dextrose gel to prevent neonatal hypoglycaemia at two hospitals in New Zealand. Babies at risk of hypoglycaemia (infant of a mother with diabetes, late preterm delivery, small or large birthweight, or other risk factors) but without indication for admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were randomly allocated either to one of four treatment groups: 40% dextrose at one of two doses (0.5 ml/kg = 200 mg/kg, or 1 ml/kg = 400 mg/kg), either once at 1 h of age or followed by three additional doses of dextrose (0.5 ml/kg before feeds in the first 12 h); or to one of four corresponding placebo groups. Treatments were administered by massaging gel into the buccal mucosa. The primary outcome was hypoglycaemia (<2.6 mM) in the first 48 h. Secondary outcomes included admission to a NICU, admission for hypoglycaemia, and breastfeeding at discharge and at 6 wk. Prespecified potential dose limitations were tolerance of gel, time taken to administer, messiness, and acceptability to parents. From August 2013 to November 2014, 416 babies were randomised. Compared to babies randomised to placebo, the risk of hypoglycaemia was lowest in babies randomised to a single dose of 200 mg/kg dextrose gel (relative risk [RR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.99, p = 0.04) but was not significantly different between dose groups (p = 0.21). Compared to multiple doses, single doses of gel were better tolerated, quicker to administer, and less messy, but these limitations were not different between dextrose and placebo gel groups. Babies who received any dose of dextrose gel were less likely to develop hypoglycaemia than those who received placebo (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.98, p = 0.03; number needed to treat = 10, 95% CI 5-115). Rates of NICU admission were similar (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.33-1.25, p = 0.19), but admission for hypoglycaemia was less common in babies randomised to dextrose gel (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.21-1.01, p = 0.05). Rates of breastfeeding were similar in both groups. Adverse effects were uncommon and not different between groups. A limitation of this study was that most of the babies in the trial were infants of mothers with diabetes (73%), which may reduce the applicability of the results to babies from other risk groups.

conclusionsThe incidence of neonatal hypoglycaemia can be reduced with a single dose of buccal 40% dextrose gel 200 mg/kg. A large randomised trial (Hypoglycaemia Prevention with Oral Dextrose [hPOD]) is under way to determine the effects on NICU admission and later outcomes.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000322730.

Indexed as

Administration, OralDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGelsGlucoseHumansHypoglycemiaInfant, NewbornMaleNew ZealandSweetening AgentsTreatment OutcomeGelsGlucoseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID27780197
PMCPMC5079625
OpenAlexW2538890701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.