Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27780046›Full record

ReviewCurrent biology : CB2016

The Evolving Neural and Genetic Architecture of Vertebrate Olfaction.

Daniel M Bear, Jean-Marc Lassance, Hopi E Hoekstra, Sandeep Robert Datta

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Convergent motifs of early olfactory processing are recapitulated by layer-wise efficient coding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A covalent recognition strategy enables conspecific mate identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel M BearDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Jean-Marc LassanceDepartments of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Hopi E HoekstraDepartments of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Sandeep Robert DattaDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: srdatta@hms.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Characterizing Odor Maps in the Olfactory Bulb and CortexR01DC011558 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DATTA, SANDEEP R · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution sculpts the olfactory nervous system in response to the unique sensory challenges facing each species. In vertebrates, dramatic and diverse adaptations to the chemical environment are possible because of the hierarchical structure of the olfactory receptor (OR) gene superfamily: expansion or contraction of OR subfamilies accompanies major changes in habitat and lifestyle; independent selection on OR subfamilies can permit local adaptation or conserved chemical communication; and genetic variation in single OR genes can alter odor percepts and behaviors driven by precise chemical cues. However, this genetic flexibility contrasts with the relatively fixed neural architecture of the vertebrate olfactory system, which requires that new olfactory receptors integrate into segregated and functionally distinct neural pathways. This organization allows evolution to couple critical chemical signals with selectively advantageous responses, but also constrains relationships between olfactory receptors and behavior. The coevolution of the OR repertoire and the olfactory system therefore reveals general principles of how the brain solves specific sensory problems and how it adapts to new ones.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSmellAnimalsOlfactory Receptor NeuronsReceptors, OdorantVertebratesReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID27780046
PMCPMC5104188
OpenAlexW2536163625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.