Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27780002›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2016

Bordetella pseudohinzii as a Confounding Organism in Murine Models of Pulmonary Disease.

Sarah E Clark, Jeanette E Purcell, Saad Sammani, Earl K Steffen, Marcus J Crim, Robert S Livingston, Cynthia Besch-Williford, Jeffrey D Fortman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guidance on Establishing Health Monitoring Panels for Laboratory Mice to Reflect Contemporary Pathogen Prevalence.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Non-classicalThe Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Diagnosis, Surveillance and Management ofComparative medicine · 2020
    Article
  8. Isolation and characterization ofAnimal models and experimental medicine · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cross-Foster Rederivation Compared with Antibiotic Administration in the Drinking Water to EradicateJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Article
  13. Cystic Fibrosis Mice Develop Spontaneous ChronicJournal of infectious pulmonary diseases · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E ClarkBiologic Resources Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA shassing@uic.edu.
Jeanette E PurcellBiologic Resources Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Saad SammaniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Translational and Regenerative Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Earl K SteffenIDEXX BioResearch, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Marcus J CrimIDEXX BioResearch, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Robert S LivingstonIDEXX BioResearch, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Cynthia Besch-WillifordIDEXX BioResearch, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Jeffrey D FortmanBiologic Resources Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
IDEXX Laboratories (United States) · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A group studying acute lung injury observed an increased percentage of neutrophils in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid of mice. BAL was performed, and lung samples were collected sterilely from 5 C57BL/6 mice that had been bred inhouse. Pure colonies of bacteria, initially identified as Bordetella hinzii were cultured from 2 of the 5 mice which had the highest percentages of neutrophils (21% and 26%) in the BAL fluid. Subsequent sequencing of a portion of the ompA gene from this isolate demonstrated 100% homology with the published B. pseudohinzii sequence. We then selected 10 mice from the investigator's colony to determine the best test to screen for B. pseudohinzii in the facility. BAL was performed, the left lung lobe was collected for culture and PCR analysis, the right lung lobe and nasal passages were collected for histopathology, an oral swab was collected for culture, and an oral swab and fecal pellets were collected for PCR analysis. B. pseudohinzii was cultured from the oral cavity, lung, or both in 8 of the 10 mice analyzed. All 8 of these mice were fecal PCR positive for B. pseudohinzii; 7 had increased neutrophils (5% to 20%) in the BAL fluid, whereas the 8th mouse had a normal neutrophil percentage (2%). Active bronchopneumonia was not observed, but some infected mice had mild to moderate rhinitis. B. pseudohinzii appears to be a microbial agent of importance in mouse colonies that can confound pulmonary research. Commercial vendors and institutions should consider colony screening, routine reporting, and exclusion of B. pseudohinzii.

Indexed as

AnimalsBordetellaBordetella InfectionsLung DiseasesMice, Inbred C57BLMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRodent Diseases

Identifiers

PMID27780002
PMCPMC5073060
OpenAlexW2545575257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.