Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27779995›Full record

ArticleThe American surgeon2016

Second Primary Melanoma: Risk Factors, Histopathologic Features, Survival, and Implications for Follow-Up.

Maris S Jones, Hitoe Torisu-Itakura, Devin C Flaherty, Hans F Schoellhammer, Jihey Lee, Myung-Shim Sim, Mark B Faries

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American surgeon, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Survival impact of second primary cutaneous and non-cutaneous melanoma in melanoma survivors.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  4. Primary Cutaneous Melanoma-Management in 2024.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maris S JonesJohn Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Hitoe Torisu-Itakura
Devin C Flaherty
Hans F Schoellhammer
Jihey Lee
Myung-Shim Sim
Mark B Faries

Funding

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY WITH COMBINATION THERMO-CHEMOTHERAPYP01CA029605 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COCHRAN, ALISTAIR JOHN · 1985 to 2013
$75.2M
Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT II) in MelanomaR01CA189163 · NCI · SAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE · PI FARIES, MARK B · 2014 to 2018
$8.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA029605NCI NIH HHS R01 CA189163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact on survival of a second primary melanoma (SPM) is unclear. We used our melanoma center's database to examine clinicopathologic risk factors and outcomes of stage 0 to IV cutaneous melanoma in patients with one versus two primaries. Among 12,325 patients with primary melanoma, 969 (7.86%) developed SPM. SPMs were significantly thinner than autologous primary melanomas (P = 0.01), and 451 SPM patients had better overall and melanoma-specific survival than 451 prognostically matched non-SPM patients (P < 0.0001 and 0.0001, respectively) at a median follow-up of 142.37 months. Patients with cutaneous melanoma are at high risk for development of SPM, but the development of SPM does not seem to impair survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsCaliforniaDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID27779995
PMCPMC5555365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.