ArticleBioconjugate chemistry2016
Controlled Detachment of Chemically Glued Cells.
Article in Bioconjugate chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Enzyme-Responsive Self-Immolative Recognition Marker for Manipulating Cell-Cell Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Cell Surface Engineering Tools for Programming Living Assemblies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Metabolic Glycoengineering: A Promising Strategy to Remodel Microenvironments for Regenerative Therapy.Stem cells international · 2023Review
- The Applications of Metabolic Glycoengineering.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Cell-cell interactionsChemical science · 2021Article
- Biomedical applications of copper-free click chemistry:Chemical science · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We demonstrate a chemically detachable cell-glue system based on linkers containing disulfide bonds as well as functional groups for metabolic glycoengineering and bioorthogonal click chemistry. Azide groups are generated on the cell surface by metabolic glycoengineering, and they are further modified into tetrazine (Tz) or trans-cyclooctene (TCO) using rationally designed cross-linkers. When the Tz-modified and TCO-modified cells are mixed together, cell gluing between these two cell groups is established by Tz-TCO click chemistry. This artificial cell-cell adhesion can be broken by the administration of glutathione (5 mM), which triggers the degradation of disulfide bonds. Both the gluing and detachment processes are rapid (<10 min) and minimally cytotoxic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.