Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27779190›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Single-cell lineage tracing in the mammary gland reveals stochastic clonal dispersion of stem/progenitor cell progeny.

Felicity M Davis, Bethan Lloyd-Lewis, Olivia B Harris, Sarah Kozar, Douglas J Winton, Leila Muresan, Christine J Watson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Breast Morphogenesis: From Normal Development to Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Cells-of-Origin of Breast Cancer and Intertumoral Heterogeneity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. The molecular chronology of mammary epithelial cell fate switching.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Using Organoids to Tap Mammary Gland Diversity for Novel Insight.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Felicity M DavisDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.
Bethan Lloyd-LewisDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.
Olivia B HarrisDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2641-6472
Sarah KozarCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
Douglas J WintonCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
Leila MuresanCambridge Advanced Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7602-0249
Christine J WatsonDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-5902
University of Cambridge · GBWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GBThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17044Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MR/J001023/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammary gland undergoes cycles of growth and regeneration throughout reproductive life, a process that requires mammary stem cells (MaSCs). Whilst recent genetic fate-mapping studies using lineage-specific promoters have provided valuable insights into the mammary epithelial hierarchy, the true differentiation potential of adult MaSCs remains unclear. To address this, herein we utilize a stochastic genetic-labelling strategy to indelibly mark a single cell and its progeny in situ, combined with tissue clearing and 3D imaging. Using this approach, clones arising from a single parent cell could be visualized in their entirety. We reveal that clonal progeny contribute exclusively to either luminal or basal lineages and are distributed sporadically to branching ducts or alveoli. Quantitative analyses suggest that pools of unipotent stem/progenitor cells contribute to adult mammary gland development. Our results highlight the utility of tracing a single cell and reveal that progeny of a single proliferative MaSC/progenitor are dispersed throughout the epithelium.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageClone CellsEpithelial CellsEpitheliumFemaleImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMammary Glands, AnimalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, AnimalOrganogenesis

Identifiers

PMID27779190
PMCPMC5093309
OpenAlexW2535967559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.