Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27779189›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Microtubule organization is determined by the shape of epithelial cells.

Juan Manuel Gomez, Lyubov Chumakova, Natalia A Bulgakova, Nicholas H Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cytoskeletal organization in isolated plant cells under geometry control.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Actin-microtubule crosstalk in cell biology.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan Manuel GomezDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, and the Gurdon Institute, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.
Lyubov ChumakovaSchool of Mathematics and Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK.
Natalia A BulgakovaDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, and the Gurdon Institute, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3780-8164
Nicholas H BrownDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, and the Gurdon Institute, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UKWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interphase microtubule organization is critical for cell function and tissue architecture. In general, physical mechanisms are sufficient to drive microtubule organization in single cells, whereas cells within tissues are thought to utilize signalling mechanisms. By improving the imaging and quantitation of microtubule alignment within developing Drosophila embryos, here we demonstrate that microtubule alignment underneath the apical surface of epithelial cells follows cell shape. During development, epidermal cell elongation and microtubule alignment occur simultaneously, but by perturbing cell shape, we discover that microtubule organization responds to cell shape, rather than the converse. A simple set of microtubule behaviour rules is sufficient for a computer model to mimic the observed responses to changes in cell surface geometry. Moreover, we show that microtubules colliding with cell boundaries zip-up or depolymerize in an angle-dependent manner, as predicted by the model. Finally, we show microtubule alignment responds to cell shape in diverse epithelia.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCadherinsCell ShapeDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianEpithelial CellsGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInterphaseLarvaLuminescent ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsMicrotubulesMorphogenesisCadherinsDrosophila ProteinsFbp1protein, Drosophilafj protein, DrosophilaGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsRed Fluorescent Proteinshg protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID27779189
PMCPMC5093320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.