ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2017
Test-retest repeatability of patterns of brain activation provoked by bladder filling.
Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Mind-body (hypnotherapy) treatment of women with urgency urinary incontinence: changes in brain attentional networks.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Trial
- A sensation driven functional MRI study on brain activation during bladder filling in healthy participants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Testing a new, intensified infusion-withdrawal protocol for urinary urgency provocation in brain-bladder studies.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2021Article
- Functional connectivity of the brain in older women with urgency urinary incontinence.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2018Article
- Understanding overactive bladder and urgency incontinence: what does the brain have to do with it?F1000Research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess short-term repeatability of an fMRI protocol widely used to assess brain control of the bladder. fMRI offers the potential to discern incontinence phenotypes as well as the mechanisms mediating therapeutic response. If so, this could enable more targeted efforts to enhance therapy. Such data, however, require excellent test-retest repeatability.
methodsFifty-nine older women (age ≥60 years) with urgency incontinence underwent two fMRI scans within 5-10 min with a concurrent bladder infusion/withdrawal protocol. Activity in three brain regions relevant to bladder control was compared using paired t tests and intra-class correlation.
resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in brain activity between the two consecutive scans in the regions of interest. Intra-class correlation was 0.19 in the right insula, 0.32 in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area, and 0.44 in the medial pre-frontal cortex. Such correlations are considered fair or poor, but are comparable to those from studies of other repeated fMRI tasks.
conclusionsThis is the first evaluation of the repeatability of a bladder fMRI protocol. The technique used provides a framework for comparing different fMRI protocols applied to brain-bladder research. Despite universal patient response to the stimulus, brain response had limited repeatability within individuals. Improvement of the investigational protocol should magnify brain response and reduce variability. These results suggest that although analysis of fMRI data among groups of subjects yields valuable insight into bladder control, fMRI is not yet appropriate for evaluation of the brain's role in continence on an individual level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.