ArticleAnnals of intensive care2016
The critical care response to a hospital outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection: an observational study.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Fatality Rates for Patients with COVID-19 Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. A Meta-analysis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Pharmacologic Treatments and Supportive Care for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.Emerging infectious diseases · 2020Pooled it
- Rate of Intensive Care Unit admission and outcomes among patients with coronavirus: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- A Narrative Review on the Recent Insights Into the Pathogenicity and Potential Role of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in the Emergence of "Disease X".Health science reports · 2025Article
- Impact of adapting paediatric intensive care units for adult care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Article
- The positive impact of COVID-19 on critical care: from unprecedented challenges to transformative changes, from the perspective of young intensivists.Annals of intensive care · 2023Review
- Does a Low Score in the Respiratory Visual Triage Tool Predict a Negative COVID-19 Test in an Admitted Patient?Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2023Article
- Willingness to Work during Public Health Emergencies: A Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Explaining the challenges of the Iranian Health System in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic: A Qualitative Study.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021Article
- Managing critical care during COVID-19 pandemic: The experience of an ICU of a tertiary care hospital.Journal of infection and public health · 2021Article
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on liver, liver diseases, and liver transplantation programs in intensive care units.World journal of hepatology · 2021Review
- Peptide-Based Inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV.Advanced therapeutics · 2021Review
- Healthcare providers' challenges during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A qualitative approach.Nursing & health sciences · 2021Article
- Kidney involvement in coronavirus-associated diseases (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Global prevalence and determinants of mortality among patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Review
- Article
- Nitric oxide (NO) and nanoparticles - Potential small tools for the war against COVID-19 and other human coronavirus infections.Virus research · 2021Review
- Virus load and virus shedding of SARS-CoV-2 and their impact on patient outcomes.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMiddle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) has caused several hospital outbreaks, including a major outbreak at King Abdulaziz Medical City, a 940-bed tertiary-care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (August-September 2015). To learn from our experience, we described the critical care response to the outbreak.
methodsThis observational study was conducted at the Intensive Care Department which covered 5 ICUs with 60 single-bedded rooms. We described qualitatively and, as applicable, quantitatively the response of intensive care services to the outbreak. The clinical course and outcomes of healthcare workers (HCWs) who had MERS were noted.
resultsSixty-three MERS patients were admitted to 3 MERS-designated ICUs during the outbreak (peak census = 27 patients on August 25, 2015, and the last new case on September 13, 2015). Most patients had multiorgan failure. Eight HCWs had MERS requiring ICU admission (median stay = 28 days): Seven developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, four were treated with prone positioning, four needed continuous renal replacement therapy and one had extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The hospital mortality of ICU MERS patients was 63.4 % (0 % for the HCWs). In response to the outbreak, the number of negative-pressure rooms was increased from 14 to 38 rooms in 3 MERS-designated ICUs. Patients were managed with a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:0.8. Infection prevention practices were intensified. As a surrogate, surface disinfectant and hand hygiene gel consumption increased by ~30 % and 17 N95 masks were used per patient/day on average. Family visits were restricted to 2 h/day. Although most ICU staff expressed concerns about acquiring MERS, all reported to work normally. During the outbreak, 27.0 % of nurses and 18.4 % of physicians working in the MERS-designated ICUs reported upper respiratory symptoms, and were tested for MERS-CoV. Only 2/196 (1.0 %) ICU nurses and 1/80 (1.3 %) physician tested positive, had mild disease and recovered fully. The total sick leave duration was 138 days for nurses and 30 days for physicians.
conclusionsOur hospital outbreak of MERS resulted in 63 patients requiring organ support and prolonged ICU stay with a high mortality rate. The ICU response required careful facility and staff management and proper infection control and prevention practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.