Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27778204›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2017

Rates and Predictors of Endoscopic and Clinical Recurrence After Primary Ileocolic Resection for Crohn's Disease.

Kyle Joshua Fortinsky, David Kevans, Judy Qiang, Wei Xu, Felipe Bellolio, Hillary Steinhart, Raquel Milgrom, Gordon Greenberg, Zane Cohen, Helen Macrae and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Risk factors for recurrence after bowel resection for Crohn's disease.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kyle Joshua FortinskyUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. kyle.fortinsky@mail.utoronto.ca.
David KevansUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Judy QiangUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Wei XuUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Felipe BellolioUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Hillary SteinhartUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Raquel MilgromUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Gordon GreenbergUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Zane CohenUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Helen MacraeUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Joanne StempakUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Robin McLeodUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mark S SilverbergUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe utility of postoperative medical prophylaxis (POMP) and the treatment of mild endoscopic recurrence remain controversial.

methodsThis study is a retrospective review of patients undergoing a primary ileocolic resection for CD at a single academic center. Endoscopic recurrence (ER) was defined using the Rutgeerts score (RS), and clinical recurrence (CR) was defined as symptoms of CD with endoscopic or radiologic evidence of neo-terminal ileal disease.

resultsThere were 171 patients who met inclusion criteria. The cumulative probability of ER (RS ≥ i-1) at 1, 2, and 5 years was 29, 51, and 77 %, respectively. The only independent predictors of ER were the absence of POMP (HR 1.50; P = 0.03) and penetrating disease behavior (HR 1.50; P = 0.05). The cumulative probability of CR at 1, 2, and 5 years was 8, 13, and 27 %, respectively. There was a higher rate of clinical recurrence in patients with RS-2 compared to RS-1 on the initial postoperative endoscopy (HR 2.50; P = 0.02). In 11 patients not exposed to POMP with i-1 on initial endoscopy, only 2 patients (18 %) progressed endoscopically during the study period while 5 patients (45 %) regressed to i-0 on subsequent endoscopy without treatment.

conclusionsPostoperative medical prophylaxis decreased the likelihood of ER while certain phenotypes of CD appear to increase the risk of developing ER and CR. There may be a role for watchful waiting in patients with mild endoscopic recurrence on the initial postoperative endoscopy.

Indexed as

ColectomyAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedAge FactorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalColonCrohn DiseaseEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIleumImmunologic FactorsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalImmunologic FactorsMesalamineClinical recurrenceEndoscopic recurrenceEndoscopyPostoperative prophylaxisQuality of lifeSocio-economical and psychological endpointsSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.