Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27778077›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2017

Plate Fixation Versus Intramedullary Nailing for Both-Bone Forearm Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies.

Liang Zhao, Baojun Wang, Xiaodong Bai, Zhenyu Liu, Hua Gao, Yadong Li

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The top 50 most cited articles in both-bone forearm open reduction internal fixation in the skeletally mature patient.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liang ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95, Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Baojun WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95, Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China. docbjwang@126.com.
Xiaodong BaiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95, Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Zhenyu LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95, Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Hua GaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95, Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Yadong LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95, Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Beijing Friendship Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and functional outcomes of operative intervention in patients with both-bone forearm fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates or intramedullary (IM) nailing.

methodsStudies published in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SinoMed (Chinese BioMedical Literature Service System, China), and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China) were systematically searched. The main outcomes included time to union, union rate, operation time, magnitude and location of radial bow, loss of forearm rotation, and complication rates. Results were expressed with weighted mean difference or risk ratio with 95 % confidence intervals. Pooled estimates were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model according to the heterogeneity among studies.

resultsA total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with ORIF, IM nailing significantly reduced the operation time and complication rate. However, no significant differences were observed between the two surgical techniques in several outcomes, including time to union, union rate, radial bow magnitude, and loss of forearm rotation. Except in complications, these findings were consistent across the subgroup analysis of children and adult patients.

conclusionIM nailing is associated with shorter operation time and lower complication rate compared with ORIF. It is an effective and safe treatment option for children and adults with both forearm fractures. However, considering the limitations in this study, large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to indentify these findings.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFracture Fixation, InternalHumansOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRadius FracturesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUlna Fractures

Identifiers

PMID27778077
OpenAlexW2535843579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.