Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27778059›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2016

[Intelligent operating room suite : From passive medical devices to the self-thinking cognitive surgical assistant].

H G Kenngott, M Wagner, A A Preukschas, B P Müller-Stich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Impact of Design on Medical Device Safety.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Surgical data science: The new knowledge domain.Innovative surgical sciences · 2017
    Article
  6. [Comprehensive system integration and networking in operating rooms].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H G KenngottAbteilung für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität Heidelberg, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
M WagnerAbteilung für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität Heidelberg, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
A A PreukschasAbteilung für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität Heidelberg, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
B P Müller-StichAbteilung für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität Heidelberg, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. beat.mueller@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern operating room (OR) suites are mostly digitally connected but until now the primary focus was on the presentation, transfer and distribution of images. Device information and processes within the operating theaters are barely considered. Cognitive assistance systems have triggered a fundamental rethinking in the automotive industry as well as in logistics. In principle, tasks in the OR, some of which are highly repetitive, also have great potential to be supported by automated cognitive assistance via a self-thinking system. This includes the coordination of the entire workflow in the perioperative process in both the operating theater and the whole hospital. With corresponding data from hospital information systems, medical devices and appropriate models of the surgical process, intelligent systems could optimize the workflow in the operating theater in the near future and support the surgeon. Preliminary results on the use of device information and automatically controlled OR suites are already available. Such systems include, for example the guidance of laparoscopic camera systems. Nevertheless, cognitive assistance systems that make use of knowledge about patients, processes and other pieces of information to improve surgical treatment are not yet available in the clinical routine but are urgently needed in order to automatically assist the surgeon in situation-related activities and thus substantially improve patient care.

Indexed as

Electronic Data ProcessingHumansLaparoscopyMonitoring, IntraoperativeOperating Room Information SystemsOperating RoomsSoftwareSurgery, Computer-AssistedSurgical EquipmentWorkflowApparatus and instrumentsAutomatic data processingLaparoscopyMedical deviceRobotic surgical proceduresSurgery 4.0

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.