Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27778047›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2017

Relative contributions of spatial weighting, explicit knowledge and proprioception to hand localisation during positional ambiguity.

Valeria Bellan, Helen R Gilpin, Tasha R Stanton, Lilja K Dagsdóttir, Alberto Gallace, G Lorimer Moseley

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valeria BellanBody in Mind Research Group - The Sansom Institute for Health Research Adelaide, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Helen R GilpinBody in Mind Research Group - The Sansom Institute for Health Research Adelaide, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Tasha R StantonBody in Mind Research Group - The Sansom Institute for Health Research Adelaide, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Lilja K DagsdóttirSection of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Department of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Åarhus, Denmark.
Alberto GallaceDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, 20126, Italy.
G Lorimer MoseleyBody in Mind Research Group - The Sansom Institute for Health Research Adelaide, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia. lorimer.moseley@unisa.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When vision and proprioception are rendered incongruent during a hand localisation task, vision is initially weighted more than proprioception in determining location, and proprioception gains more weighting over time. However, it is not known whether, under these incongruency conditions, particular areas of space are also weighted more heavily than others, nor whether explicit knowledge of the sensory incongruence (i.e. disconfirming the perceived location of the hand) modulates the effect. Here, we hypothesised that both non-informative inputs coming from one side of space and explicit knowledge of sensory incongruence would modulate perceived location of the limb. Specifically, we expected spatial weighting to shift hand localisation towards the weighted area of space, and we expected greater weighting of proprioceptive input once perceived location was demonstrated to be inaccurate. We manipulated spatial weighting using an established auditory cueing paradigm (Experiment 1, n = 18) and sensory incongruence using the 'disappearing hand trick' (Experiment 2, n = 9). Our first hypothesis was not supported-spatial weighting did not modulate hand localisation. Our second hypothesis was only partially supported-disconfirmation of hand position did lead to more accurate localisations, even if participants were still unaware of their hand position. This raised the possibility that rather than disconfirmation, a simple movement of the hand in view could update the sensory-motor system, by immediately increasing the weighting of proprioceptive input relative to visual input. This third hypothesis was then confirmed (Experiment 3, n = 9). These results suggest that hand localisation is robust in the face of differential weighting of space, but open to modulation in a modality-specific manner, when one sense (vision) is rendered inaccurate.

Indexed as

HandAdultAnalysis of VarianceCuesFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMovementProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionYoung AdultBody representationHand localisationProprioceptionSelf-localisation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.