Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27777833›Full record

ReviewChemistryOpen2016

Chemical O-Glycosylations: An Overview.

Rituparna Das, Balaram Mukhopadhyay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemistryOpen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Metabolic engineering ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Site-Selective Distal Arylation of Sugars Enabled by Cyclic Acetals.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microbial Production of Human Milk Oligosaccharides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rituparna DasDepartment of Chemical Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Kolkata Mohanpur Nadia 741246 India.
Balaram MukhopadhyayDepartment of Chemical Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Kolkata Mohanpur Nadia 741246 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of glycobiology relies on the sources of particular oligosaccharides in their purest forms. As the isolation of the oligosaccharide structures from natural sources is not a reliable option for providing samples with homogeneity, chemical means become pertinent. The growing demand for diverse oligosaccharide structures has prompted the advancement of chemical strategies to stitch sugar molecules with precise stereo- and regioselectivity through the formation of glycosidic bonds. This Review will focus on the key developments towards chemical O-glycosylations in the current century. Synthesis of novel glycosyl donors and acceptors and their unique activation for successful glycosylation are discussed. This Review concludes with a summary of recent developments and comments on future prospects.

Indexed as

catalysisglycosylation reactionspromotersprotecting groupsstereoselectivity

Identifiers

PMID27777833
PMCPMC5062006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.