Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27777722›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Nuclear-mitochondrial epistasis: a gene's eye view of genomic conflict.

Michael J Wade, Devin M Drown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Polygenic response of sex chromosomes to sexual antagonism.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024
    Article
  2. Genetic conflicts and the case for licensed anthropomorphizing.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2022
    Review
  3. Mitochondrial-Y chromosome epistasis inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  4. Mitonuclear conflict and cooperation govern the integration of genotypes, phenotypes and environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael J WadeDepartment of Biology Indiana University Bloomington Indiana 47405.
Devin M DrownDepartment of Biology Indiana University Bloomington Indiana 47405; Institute of Arctic Biology University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks Alaska 99775.ORCID 0000-0002-2437-7019

Funding

The Administrative CoreP20GM103395 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS · PI BRIAN M BARNES · 2012 to 2026
$66.1M
The effect of coinheritance on host-symbiont coevolutionR01GM084238 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI WADE, MICHAEL J · 2008 to 2015
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103395NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We use population genetic models to investigate the cooperative and conflicting synergistic fitness effects between genes from the nucleus and the mitochondrion. By varying fitness parameters, we examine the scope for conflict relative to cooperation among genomes and the utility of the "gene's eye view" analytical approach, which is based on the marginal average fitness of specific alleles. Because sexual conflict can maintain polymorphism of mitochondrial haplotypes, we can explore two types of evolutionary conflict (genomic and sexual) with one epistatic model. We find that the nuclear genetic architecture (autosomal, X-linked, or Z-linked) and the mating system change the regions of parameter space corresponding to the evolution by sexual and genomic conflict. For all models, regardless of conflict or cooperation, we find that population mean fitness increases monotonically as evolution proceeds. Moreover, we find that the process of gene frequency change with positive, synergistic fitnesses is self-accelerating, as the success of an allele in one genome or in one sex increases the frequency of the interacting allele upon which its success depends. This results in runaway evolutionary dynamics caused by the positive intergenomic associations generated by selection. An inbreeding mating system tends to further accelerate these runaway dynamics because it maintains favorable host-symbiont or male-female gene combinations. In contrast, where conflict predominates, the success of an allele in one genome or in one sex diminishes the frequency of the corresponding allele in the other, resulting in considerably slower evolutionary dynamics. The rate of change of mean fitness is also much faster with positive, synergistic fitnesses and much slower where conflict is predominant. Consequently, selection rapidly fixes cooperative gene combinations, while leaving behind a slowing evolving residue of conflicting gene combinations at mutation-selection balance. We discuss how an emphasis on marginal fitness averages may obscure the interdependence of allelic fitness across genomes, making the evolutionary trajectories appear independent of one another when they are not.

Indexed as

Adaptationcoevolutioncooperationpopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID27777722
PMCPMC5058520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.