Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27777578›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2016

Charophytes: Evolutionary Giants and Emerging Model Organisms.

David S Domozych, Zoë A Popper, Iben Sørensen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Zygospore formation in Zygnematophyceae predates several land plant traits.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Zygospore development ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David S DomozychDepartment of Biology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs NY, USA.
Zoë A PopperBotany and Plant Science, School of Natural Science, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.
Iben SørensenPlant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USA.
Cornell University · USOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IESkidmore College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charophytes are the group of green algae whose ancestral lineage gave rise to land plants in what resulted in a profoundly transformative event in the natural history of the planet. Extant charophytes exhibit many features that are similar to those found in land plants and their relatively simple phenotypes make them efficacious organisms for the study of many fundamental biological phenomena. Several taxa including

Indexed as

charophytesevolutionMicrasteriasmodel organismsPenium

Identifiers

PMID27777578
PMCPMC5056234
OpenAlexW2531464673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.