Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27777445›Full record

ReviewJournal of food science and technology2016

Antimicrobial peptides as natural bio-preservative to enhance the shelf-life of food.

Mahendra Rai, Raksha Pandit, Swapnil Gaikwad, György Kövics

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Food preservatives: natural or synthetic?Archives of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Bioactive milk peptides: an updated comprehensive overview and database.Critical reviews in food science and nutrition · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Insect Antimicrobial Peptides as Guardians of Immunity and Beyond: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mahendra RaiDepartment of Biotechnology, S.G.B. Amravati University, Amravati, Maharashtra 444602 India.
Raksha PanditDepartment of Biotechnology, S.G.B. Amravati University, Amravati, Maharashtra 444602 India.
Swapnil GaikwadDepartment of Biotechnology, S.G.B. Amravati University, Amravati, Maharashtra 444602 India ; Department of Biotechnology, Engineering School of Lorena, University of Sao Paulo, Estrada Municipal do Campinho, sn, Lorena, SP 12602-810 Brazil.
György KövicsInstitute of Plant Protection, Debrecen Agricultural University, P.O. Box 36, Debrecen, H-4015 Hungary.
Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University · INUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are diverse group of natural proteins present in animals, plants, insects and bacteria. These peptides are responsible for defense of host from pathogenic organisms. Chemical, enzymatic and recombinant techniques are used for the synthesis of antimicrobial peptides. These peptides have been found to be an alternative to the chemical preservatives. Currently, nisin is the only antimicrobial peptide, which is widely utilized in the preservation of food. Antimicrobial peptides can be used alone or in combination with other antimicrobial, essential oils and polymeric nanoparticles to enhance the shelf-life of food. This review presents an overview on different types of antimicrobial peptides, purification techniques, mode of action and application in food preservation.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial peptidesBio-preservationFood preservationNisin

Identifiers

PMID27777445
PMCPMC5069246
OpenAlexW2511368942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.