Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27777232›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Cytology in the diagnosis of cervical cancer in symptomatic young women: a retrospective review.

Anita Ww Lim, Rebecca Landy, Alejandra Castanon, Antony Hollingworth, Willie Hamilton, Nick Dudding, Peter Sasieni

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. RCGP Research Paper of the Year 2016: how the winning papers are so relevant to clinical practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anita Ww LimCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University, London.
Rebecca LandyCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University, London.
Alejandra CastanonCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University, London.
Antony HollingworthDepartment of Gynaecology, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London.
Willie HamiltonDepartment of Primary Care, St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter.
Nick DuddingEast Pennine Cytology Training Centre, Raynham House, Leeds.
Peter SasieniCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University, London.
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer in young women presents a diagnostic challenge because gynaecological symptoms are common but underlying disease is rare.

aimTo explore the potential for using cytology as a diagnostic aid for cervical cancer in young women. DESIGN AND

settingRetrospective review of primary care records and cytology data from the national cervical screening database and national audit of cervical cancers.

methodFour datasets of women aged 20-29 years in England were examined: primary care records and national screening data from an in-depth study of cervical cancers; cytology from the national audit of cervical cancers; whole-population cytology from the national screening database; and general-population primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The authors explored the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of symptomatic cytology (earliest <12 months before diagnosis) to cervical cancer.

resultsThe estimated prevalence of cervical cancer among symptomatic women was between 0.4% and 0.9%. The sensitivity of moderate dyskaryosis (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL]) or worse in women aged 20-29 years was 90.9% to 96.2% across datasets, regardless of symptom status. The PPV was estimated to be between 10.0% and 30.0%. For women aged 20-24 years, the PPV of '?invasive squamous carcinoma' was 25.4%, and 2.0% for severe or worse cytology.

conclusionCytology has value beyond screening, and could be used as a diagnostic aid for earlier detection of cervical cancer in young women with gynaecological symptoms by ruling in urgent referral.

Indexed as

AdultCytological TechniquesEarly Detection of CancerEnglandFemaleHumansPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsYoung Adultcervical cancercervical cytologyearly diagnosisgynaecological symptomsretrospective studyyoung women

Identifiers

PMID27777232
PMCPMC5198672
OpenAlexW2537858071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.