ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016
Cytology in the diagnosis of cervical cancer in symptomatic young women: a retrospective review.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Symptom attributions by cervical cancer patients attending specialized care at the Uganda cancer institute: a cross-sectional study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Preventive Health Screening during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey among 102,928 Internet Users in Poland.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Importance of Cytopathologic Diagnosis in Early Cancer Diagnosis in Resource-Constrained Countries.JCO global oncology · 2022Review
- Prevalence and Genotype Distribution of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection in Women with Abnormal Cervical Cytology: A Population-Based Study in Shanxi Province, China.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- Recognizing Gynecological Cancer in Primary Care: Risk Factors, Red Flags, and Referrals.Advances in therapy · 2018Article
- RCGP Research Paper of the Year 2016: how the winning papers are so relevant to clinical practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer in young women presents a diagnostic challenge because gynaecological symptoms are common but underlying disease is rare.
aimTo explore the potential for using cytology as a diagnostic aid for cervical cancer in young women. DESIGN AND
settingRetrospective review of primary care records and cytology data from the national cervical screening database and national audit of cervical cancers.
methodFour datasets of women aged 20-29 years in England were examined: primary care records and national screening data from an in-depth study of cervical cancers; cytology from the national audit of cervical cancers; whole-population cytology from the national screening database; and general-population primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The authors explored the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of symptomatic cytology (earliest <12 months before diagnosis) to cervical cancer.
resultsThe estimated prevalence of cervical cancer among symptomatic women was between 0.4% and 0.9%. The sensitivity of moderate dyskaryosis (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL]) or worse in women aged 20-29 years was 90.9% to 96.2% across datasets, regardless of symptom status. The PPV was estimated to be between 10.0% and 30.0%. For women aged 20-24 years, the PPV of '?invasive squamous carcinoma' was 25.4%, and 2.0% for severe or worse cytology.
conclusionCytology has value beyond screening, and could be used as a diagnostic aid for earlier detection of cervical cancer in young women with gynaecological symptoms by ruling in urgent referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.