Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27776537›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2016

Cerebrospinal fluid penetration of meropenem in neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis: a prospective observational study.

Ute Blassmann, Anka C Roehr, Otto R Frey, Cornelia Vetter-Kerkhoff, Niklas Thon, William Hope, Josef Briegel, Volker Huge

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cefiderocol for Treatment of Ventriculitis (4MRGNAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rare case of resistantSurgical neurology international · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ute BlassmannDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich, 81377, Germany. ute.blassmann@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-1745
Anka C RoehrDepartment of Pharmacy, Heidenheim General Hospital, Schlosshausstrasse 100, Heidenheim, 89522, Germany.
Otto R FreyDepartment of Pharmacy, Heidenheim General Hospital, Schlosshausstrasse 100, Heidenheim, 89522, Germany.
Cornelia Vetter-KerkhoffDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Niklas ThonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
William HopeDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Josef BriegelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Volker HugeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentriculitis is a complication of temporary intraventricular drains. The limited penetration of meropenem into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is well known. However, ventricular CSF pharmacokinetic data in patients with ventriculitis are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate meropenem pharmacokinetics in the serum and CSF of neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis.

methodsWe conducted an observational pharmacokinetic study of neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis receiving meropenem. Multiple blood and CSF samples were taken and were described using nonparametric pharmacokinetic modelling with Pmetrics.

resultsIn total, 21 patients (median age 52 years, median weight 76 kg) were included. The median (range) of peak and trough concentrations in serum were 20.16 (4.40-69.00) mg/L and 2.54 (0.00-31.40) mg/L, respectively. The corresponding peak and trough concentrations in CSF were 1.20 (0.00-6.20) mg/L and 1.28 (0.00-4.10) mg/L, respectively, with a median CSF/serum ratio (range) of 0.09 (0.03-0.16). Median creatinine clearance ranged from 60.7 to 217.6 ml/minute (median 122.5 ml/minute). A three-compartment linear population pharmacokinetic model was most appropriate. No covariate relationships could be supported for any of the model parameters. Meropenem demonstrated poor penetration into CSF, with a median CSF/serum ratio of 9 % and high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability.

conclusionsAdministration of higher-than-standard doses of meropenem and therapeutic drug monitoring in both serum and CSF should be considered to individualise meropenem dosing in neurocritical care patients with ventriculitis.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCerebral VentriculitisCritical CareFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMeropenemMiddle AgedProspective StudiesThienamycinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemThienamycinsCerebrospinal fluidMeropenemNeurocritical care patientsPharmacokineticsVentriculitis

Identifiers

PMID27776537
PMCPMC5078935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.