Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27776382›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2017

Randomized controlled pilot trial of naloxone-on-release to prevent post-prison opioid overdose deaths.

Mahesh K B Parmar, John Strang, Louise Choo, Angela M Meade, Sheila M Bird

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for female drug-using offenders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The effect of take-home naloxone kits on opioid-related deaths in Alberta, Canada: An ecological analysis.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mahesh K B ParmarMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
John StrangNational Addiction Centre at King's College London, London, UK.
Louise ChooMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Angela M MeadeMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Sheila M BirdMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK.
University College London · GBKing's College London · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_EX_G0800012Medical Research Council MC_U105260794Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsNaloxone is an opioid antagonist used for emergency resuscitation following opioid overdose. Prisoners with a history of heroin injection have a high risk of drug-related death soon after release from prison. The NALoxone InVEstigation (N-ALIVE) pilot trial (ISRCTN34044390) tested feasibility measures for randomized provision of naloxone-on-release (NOR) to eligible prisoners in England.

designParallel-group randomized controlled pilot trial.

settingEnglish prisons.

participantsA total of 1685 adult heroin injectors, incarcerated for at least 7 days pre-randomization, release due within 3 months and more than 6 months since previous N-ALIVE release.

interventionUsing 1 : 1 minimization, prisoners were randomized to receive on release a pack containing either a single 'rescue' injection of naloxone or a control pack with no syringe. MEASUREMENTS: Key feasibility outcomes were tested against prior expectations: on participation (14 English prisons; 2800 prisoners), consent (75% for randomization), returned prisoner self-questionnaires (RPSQs: 207), NOR-carriage (75% in first 4 weeks) and overdose presence (80%).

findingsPrisons (16) and prisoners (1685) were willing to participate [consent rate, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 70-74%]; 218 RPSQs were received; NOR-carriage (95% CI = 63-79%) and overdose presence (95% CI = 75-84%) were as expected. We randomized 842 to NOR and 843 to control during 30 months but stopped early, because only one-third of NOR administrations were to the ex-prisoner. Nine deaths within 12 weeks of release were registered for 1557 randomized participants released before 9 December 2014.

conclusionsLarge randomized trials are feasible with prison populations. Provision of take-home emergency naloxone prior to prison release may be a life-saving interim measure to prevent heroin overdose deaths among ex-prisoners and the wider population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDrug OverdoseEnglandFemaleHeroin DependenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsPilot ProjectsPrisonersYoung AdultNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsFatalitynaloxoneopioid-overdosepost-releasepreventionprisonersrandomizationtrial

Identifiers

PMID27776382
PMCPMC5324705
OpenAlexW2545994303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.