Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2777636›Full record

ArticleThe Histochemical journal1989

Sialic acid in colonic mucin: an evaluation of modified PAS reactions in single and combination histochemical procedures.

R Roe, A P Corfield, R C Williamson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Histochemical journal, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R RoeUniversity Department of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK.
A P Corfield
R C Williamson
Bristol Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two new histochemical procedures for detecting sulphated and non-sulphated sialomucin in colonic mucosa were assessed: the saponification-Alcian Blue pH 1-periodic acid-phenylhydrazine-Schiff method (KOH-AB pH 1-PAPS) and the mild periodic acid modification of this (KOH-AB pH 1-mPAS). Using normal colonic mucosa obtained from 11 non-cancer patients, the mPAS and PAPS techniques were tested for specificity and reproducibility for staining sialic acid, either alone or in combination with Alcian Blue. A spectrophotometric method was devised to quantify the uptake of both Schiff and Alcian Blue stain by sections. At low temperature and pH 5.5, the mPAS procedure had improved specificity over the PAPS procedure, and after saponification it could be used to stain O-acetyl-substituted sialic acid. When used in combination with Alcian Blue at pH 1, however, underestimation of the sialic acid content occurred owing to interference between Alcian Blue and Schiff dyes. Interference was even greater with KOH-AB pH 1-PAPS procedure for both sialic acid and sulphate components. We conclude that caution must be exercised in interpretation of the staining results obtained with these new combination methods and that more accurate information on the sialic acid and sulphate content of colonic mucin is obtained by staining serial sections with the mPAS technique and Alcian Blue pH 1 alone.

Indexed as

ColonEvaluation Studies as TopicHistocytochemistryHumansMucinsN-Acetylneuraminic AcidPeriodic Acid-Schiff ReactionSialic AcidsSialomucinsMucinsN-Acetylneuraminic AcidSialic AcidsSialomucins

Identifiers

PMID2777636
OpenAlexW1969884871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.