Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27776171›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Analysis of Research Activity in Gastroenterology: Pancreatitis Is in Real Danger.

Andrea Szentesi, Emese Tóth, Emese Bálint, Júlia Fanczal, Tamara Madácsy, Dorottya Laczkó, Imre Ignáth, Anita Balázs, Petra Pallagi, József Maléth and 16 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04647097 (Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis Prevention by the Elimination of Alcohol and Cigarette Smoking), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04647097 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis Prevention by the Elimination of Alcohol and Cigarette Smoking (REAPPEAR): Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial and a Cohort Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PecsRan2022 to 2028Enrolled364ConditionsAcute Pancreatitis, Recurrent Acute PancreatitisArmsStandard intervention only, Standard intervention plus repeated intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  9. BMJ open · 2022
    Article
  10. An assessment of pancreatology education in North American pediatric gastroenterology fellowship programs.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Andrea SzentesiInstitute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Emese TóthFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Emese BálintFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Júlia FanczalFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Tamara MadácsyFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Dorottya LaczkóFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Imre IgnáthFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Anita BalázsFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Petra PallagiFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
József MaléthFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zoltán RakonczayFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Balázs KuiFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Dóra IllésFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Katalin MártaInstitute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Ágnes BlaskóInstitute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Alexandra DemcsákDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Health Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Andrea PárniczkyHeim Pál Children's Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Gabriella PárDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Szilárd GódiDepartment of Translational Medicine, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Dóra MosztbacherDepartment of Pediatrics, János Balassa Hospital of County Tolna, Szekszárd, Hungary.
Ákos SzücsFirst Department of Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Adrienn HalászFirst Department of Medicine, St. George University Teaching Hospital of County Fejér, Székesfehérvár, Hungary.
Ferenc IzbékiFirst Department of Medicine, St. George University Teaching Hospital of County Fejér, Székesfehérvár, Hungary.
Nelli FarkasInstitute of Bioanalysis, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBiomedical investment trends in 2015 show a huge decrease of investment in gastroenterology. Since academic research usually provides the basis for industrial research and development (R&D), our aim was to understand research trends in the field of gastroenterology over the last 50 years and identify the most endangered areas.

methodsWe searched for PubMed hits for gastrointestinal (GI) diseases for the 1965-2015 period. Overall, 1,554,325 articles were analyzed. Since pancreatology was identified as the most endangered field of research within gastroenterology, we carried out a detailed evaluation of research activity in pancreatology.

resultsIn 1965, among the major benign GI disorders, 51.9% of the research was performed on hepatitis, 25.7% on pancreatitis, 21.7% on upper GI diseases and only 0.7% on the lower GI disorders. Half a century later, in 2015, research on hepatitis and upper GI diseases had not changed significantly; however, studies on pancreatitis had dropped to 10.7%, while work on the lower GI disorders had risen to 23.4%. With regard to the malignant disorders (including liver, gastric, colon, pancreatic and oesophageal cancer), no such large-scale changes were observed in the last 50 years. Detailed analyses revealed that besides the drop in research activity in pancreatitis, there are serious problems with the quality of the studies as well. Only 6.8% of clinical trials on pancreatitis were registered and only 5.5% of these registered trials were multicentre and multinational (more than five centres and nations), i.e., the kind that provides the highest level of impact and evidence level.

conclusionsThere has been a clear drop in research activity in pancreatitis. New international networks and far more academic R&D activities should be established in order to find the first therapy specifically for acute pancreatitis.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchAcute DiseaseClinical Trials as TopicGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansInternationalityPancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID27776171
PMCPMC5077088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.