Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27776113›Full record

ArticleNature methods2016

Comparison of high-throughput sequencing data compression tools.

Ibrahim Numanagić, James K Bonfield, Faraz Hach, Jan Voges, Jörn Ostermann, Claudio Alberti, Marco Mattavelli, S Cenk Sahinalp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dear-OMG: An Omics-General Compression Method for Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics Data.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Disk compression of k-mer sets.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2021
    Article
  13. Representation ofJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. SPRING: a next-generation compressor for FASTQ data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ibrahim NumanagićSchool of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
James K BonfieldWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Faraz HachSchool of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1143-0172
Jan VogesInstitut für Informationsverarbeitung, Leibniz Universität, Hannover, Germany.
Jörn OstermannInstitut für Informationsverarbeitung, Leibniz Universität, Hannover, Germany.
Claudio AlbertiÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marco MattavelliÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
S Cenk SahinalpSchool of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing (HTS) data are commonly stored as raw sequencing reads in FASTQ format or as reads mapped to a reference, in SAM format, both with large memory footprints. Worldwide growth of HTS data has prompted the development of compression methods that aim to significantly reduce HTS data size. Here we report on a benchmarking study of available compression methods on a comprehensive set of HTS data using an automated framework.

Indexed as

AnimalsCacaoComputational BiologyData CompressionDrosophila melanogasterEscherichia coliHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID27776113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.