ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016
Commentary: How Bayes factors change scientific practice.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural correlates reveal separate stages of spontaneous face perception.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Brain dynamics of the interplay between auditory selective attention and working memory during melody encoding.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Detecting implicit biases of large language models with Bayesian hypothesis testing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Higher income is associated with greater life satisfaction, and more stress.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Dynamics of visual object coding within and across the hemispheres: Objects in the periphery.Science advances · 2025Article
- Cross-sectional study to predict subnational levels of health workers' knowledge about severe malaria treatment in Kenya.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Neurophysiological correlates of dual tasking in people with Parkinson's disease and freezing of gait.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer forSocial psychological and personality science · 2017Article
- An Examination of the Neural Unreliability Thesis of Autism.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2017Article
- Modification of episodic memories by novel learning: a failed replication study.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2017Article
- Commentary: Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.