Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27775061›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Foundations of cumulative culture in apes: improved foraging efficiency through relinquishing and combining witnessed behaviours in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Sarah J Davis, Gillian L Vale, Steven J Schapiro, Susan P Lambeth, Andrew Whiten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The importance of thinking about the future in culture and cumulative cultural evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human cumulative culture and the exploitation of natural phenomena.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Beyond social learning.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Development of Cumulative Cultural Learning.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah J DavisCentre for Social learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology &Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9JP, Scotland.
Gillian L ValeCentre for Social learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology &Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9JP, Scotland.
Steven J SchapiroNational Center for Chimpanzee Care, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Michale E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX 78602, USA.
Susan P LambethNational Center for Chimpanzee Care, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Michale E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX 78602, USA.
Andrew WhitenCentre for Social learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology &Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9JP, Scotland.

Funding

The National Center for Chimpanzee CareU42OD011197 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ABEE, CHRISTIAN R · 2012 to 2019
$19.7M
NIH HHS U42 OD011197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vital prerequisite for cumulative culture, a phenomenon often asserted to be unique to humans, is the ability to modify behaviour and flexibly switch to more productive or efficient alternatives. Here, we first established an inefficient solution to a foraging task in five captive chimpanzee groups (N = 19). Three groups subsequently witnessed a conspecific using an alternative, more efficient, solution. When participants could successfully forage with their established behaviours, most individuals did not switch to this more efficient technique; however, when their foraging method became substantially less efficient, nine chimpanzees with socially-acquired information (four of whom witnessed additional human demonstrations) relinquished their old behaviour in favour of the more efficient one. Only a single chimpanzee in control groups, who had not witnessed a knowledgeable model, discovered this. Individuals who switched were later able to combine components of their two learned techniques to produce a more efficient solution than their extensively used, original foraging method. These results suggest that, although chimpanzees show a considerable degree of conservatism, they also have an ability to combine independent behaviours to produce efficient compound action sequences; one of the foundational abilities (or candidate mechanisms) for human cumulative culture.

Indexed as

Imitative BehaviorLearningPan troglodytesAnimalsFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleReward

Identifiers

PMID27775061
PMCPMC5075880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.