Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27774609›Full record

Trial reportTransfusion2017

A randomized trial to evaluate the use of text messaging, letter, and telephone call reminders to improve return of blood donors with reactive serologic tests.

Francisco Augusto Porto-Ferreira, Cesar de Almeida-Neto, Edward L Murphy, Sandra de Camargo Montebello, Fátima Aparecida Hangai Nogueira, Edina Mariko Koga da Silva, William MacFarland, Brian Custer

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transfusion, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francisco Augusto Porto-FerreiraFundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo.
Cesar de Almeida-NetoFundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo.
Edward L MurphyBlood Systems Research Institute.
Sandra de Camargo MontebelloFundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo.
Fátima Aparecida Hangai NogueiraFundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo.
Edina Mariko Koga da SilvaDepartment of Emergency Medicine Based on Evidences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
William MacFarlandUniversity of California, San Francisco, California.
Brian CusterBlood Systems Research Institute.

Funding

Health Outcomes in Blood Donors and RecipientsK24HL075036 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MURPHY, EDWARD L · 2004 to 2013
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL075036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow return rates for notification and counseling among donors with reactive serologic screening tests have been reported worldwide. A randomized trial to test the effectiveness of text message, letter, or telephone call reminders to improve return among nonresponding first-time blood donors with reactive serologic tests was conducted. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsDonors with serologically reactive screening test results who had a cell phone and resided in the metropolitan telephone area code of São Paulo in the period from August 2013 through July 2014 were eligible. A consecutive sample of first-time donors with reactive screening tests who had not responded to a standard letter requesting the donor return to the blood center were randomly assigned to receive a text, a new letter, or a telephone call requesting return for notification and counseling. Return rates were measured over the subsequent 30 days.

resultsThe return rate after a phone call reminder was better than that for a text message (39.8% vs. 28.4%; odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.64) but not better than that for a letter (39.8% vs. 34.4%; OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.80-1.99). Older age was a predictor of higher rate of return with each year increase in age associated with a 2% increase in the odds of return (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04).

conclusionIn nonresponding serologic reactive donors, telephone call led to a higher return rate than text message. The results of this study suggest that use of text messages, while attractive for its simplicity, will not lead to increased donor notification success after serologically reactive marker results from blood donation in Brazil.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsReminder SystemsText MessagingBrazilFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID27774609
PMCPMC5243155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.