ReviewParasitology research2017
Neurocysticercosis: a review on status in India, management, and current therapeutic interventions.
Review in Parasitology research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- The hidden threat of cysticercosis: A neglected public health problem.Open veterinary journal · 2025Review
- Temporal trends and future projections of cysticercosis-induced epilepsy: insights from the global burden of disease study 2021- a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Forearm mystery: rare flexor carpi radialis muscle cysticercosis.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Isolated cysticercosis of breast mimicking a mass lesion: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- High prevalence of neurocysticercosis among patients with epilepsy in a tertiary care hospital of Assam, India.Tropical parasitologyArticle
- Concomitant multiple subretinal cysticerci in neurocysticercosis.Tropical parasitologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tapeworms (cestodes) are segmented flatworms responsible for causing diseases that may prove fatal and difficult to treat in the absence of proper treatment and efficient drugs. Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is a common parasitic infection of the central nervous system and a major contributor to epilepsy caused by the metacestode (larva) of the human tapeworm Taenia solium, characterized by a range of pathological symptoms including epileptic seizures, headaches, and hydrocephalus. Cysticercosis is considered as a "biological imprint" of the socioeconomic development of a community in general and a country in particular. It is the single most common cause of epilepsy in the resource-poor endemic regions of the world, including most of South and Central America, India, Southeast Asia, China, and sub-Saharan Africa. A vast degree of variation in the neuropathology and clinical symptoms of NCC often makes it difficult to diagnose and manage. To add to it, emerging drug resistance to known anti-parasitic agents, together with the inability of these agents to prevent re-infection and relapse, further complicates the disease scenario. The aim of the current review was to provide the latest update on NCC with special emphasis on the Indian scenario, along with current and novel methods of diagnosis as well as scope of development for novel detection techniques, novel targets for drug development, and therapeutic interventions, as well as future challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.