ArticlePragmatic and observational research2010
Cancer risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of lung cancer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a systemic risk factor for cancer: a nationwide cohort study in Korea.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
- Update on roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.British journal of pharmacology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe goal of this study was to compare the risk of developing cancer between patients with or without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to assess the role of gender as well as the use of respiratory medication on the risk of developing lung cancer in COPD patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe used the UK-based General Practice Research Database to conduct a follow-up study with a nested case-control analysis. We identified all patients with a first-time COPD diagnosis aged 40-79 years between 1995 and 2005 and a matched COPD-free comparison group. We then identified all patients who received an incident cancer diagnosis during follow-up.
resultsAmong 35,772 COPD patients and 35,772 COPD-free patients, we identified 4506 patients with an incident cancer diagnosis, of whom 2585 (57.4%) had a previous COPD diagnosis, yielding a crude incidence rate ratio of 1.64 (95% CI 1.55-1.74). The increased risk was mainly driven by a high lung cancer risk among COPD patients, while other cancers not associated with smoking were not statistically significantly associated with an altered COPD risk. In the nested case-control analysis, the odds ratio (OR) for lung cancer associated with COPD was higher for women (OR 5.26, 95% CI 3.64-7.61) than for men (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.70-2.60). In the nested case-control analysis, none of the respiratory drugs were associated with a substantially altered risk of developing lung cancer among COPD patients.
conclusionOur findings provide further evidence that COPD is associated with an elevated lung cancer risk, and that women with COPD may be more susceptible to developing lung cancer than men. Overall, respiratory medication did not have an influence on cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.