ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2016
The Importance of Publishing Negative Results.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recording behaviour of indoor-housed farm animals automatically using machine vision technology: A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Effects of left anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in depression: a randomized controlled pilot trial.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Exploratory proof-of-concept study and failure mode analysis of a dual-lumen stent graft for transapical off-pump LVAD implantation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Doctoral theses at the medical faculty of Tunis from 2015 to 2017: Scientific publication rates and associated factors.La Tunisie medicale · 2024Article
- A critical scientific evaluation of a purportedly negative data report - response to Seneviratne et al. 2022.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Reframing the perception of outliers and negative data in translational research.Brain research bulletin · 2023Review
- Monitoring Urban Zoonotic Virus Activity: Are City Rats a Promising Surveillance Tool for Emerging Viruses?Viruses · 2022Article
- Stretching for Recovery from Groin Pain or Injury in Athletes: A Critical and Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2021Review
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer clinical and biomarkers data sharing resource document: Volume I-conceptual challenges.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2020Article
- Why (and how) we should publish negative data.EMBO reports · 2020Article
- On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- Is positive publication bias really a bias, or an intentionally created discrimination toward negative results?Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
- Isotretinoin has no effect on event-free survival across high-risk medulloblastoma molecular groups when added to maintenance: A secondary analysis of the Children's Oncology Group ACNS0332 data.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.