Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27773758›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2017

Chlamydia related bacteria (Chlamydiales) in early pregnancy: community-based cohort study.

F Reid, P Oakeshott, S R Kerry, P E Hay, J S Jensen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Chlamydiosis in Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. What is the true clinical relevance ofNew microbes and new infections · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

F ReidDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
P OakeshottPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK. Electronic address: oakeshot@sgul.ac.uk.
S R KerryPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
P E HayCourtyard Genitourinary Medicine Clinic, St George's NHS Trust, London, UK.
J S JensenStatens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
St George's, University of London · GBKing's College London · GBStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901608Medical Research Council MR/K027050/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSerological case-control studies suggest that certain chlamydia-related bacteria (Chlamydiales) which cause cows to abort may do the same in humans. Chlamydiales include Waddlia chondrophila, Chlamydia abortus and Chlamydia trachomatis. Data on prevalence of Chlamydiales in pregnancy are sparse. Using stored urine samples from a carefully characterised cohort of 847 newly pregnant women recruited from 37 general practices in London, UK, we aimed to investigate the prevalence and types of Chlamydiales infections. We also explored possible associations with miscarriage or spontaneous preterm birth.

methodsSamples were tested using W. chondrophila and pan-Chlamydiales specific real-time PCRs targeting the 16S rRNA gene. Samples positive on either PCR were subjected to DNA sequencing and C. trachomatis PCR.

resultsThe overall prevalence of Chlamydiales was 4.3% (36/847, 95% CI 3.0% to 5.8%). The prevalence of W. chondrophila was 0.6% (n = 5), C. trachomatis 1.7% (n = 14), and other Chlamydiales species 2.0% (n = 17). Infection with C. trachomatis was more common in women aged <25, of black ethnicity or with bacterial vaginosis, but this did not apply to W. chondrophila or other Chlamydiales. Follow up was 99.9% at 16 weeks gestation and 90% at term. No infection was significantly associated with miscarriage at ≤12 weeks (prevalence 10%, 81/827) or preterm birth <37 weeks (prevalence 4%, 23/628). Of 25 samples sequenced, seven (28%) were positive for Chlamydiales bacterium sequences associated with respiratory tract infections in children.

conclusionIn the first study to use the pan-Chlamydiales assay on female urine samples, 4% of pregnant women tested positive for Chlamydiales, including species known to be pathogenic in mothers and neonates.

Indexed as

ChlamydiaAbortion, SpontaneousAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesChlamydiaceae InfectionsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPremature BirthPrevalenceRisk FactorsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SChlamydialesCohort studyMiscarriagePregnancyPreterm birthPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID27773758
PMCPMC5317141
OpenAlexW2534442724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.