Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27773596›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2017

Early antiretroviral therapy initiation: access and equity of viral load testing for HIV treatment monitoring.

Trevor Peter, Dennis Ellenberger, Andrea A Kim, Debrah Boeras, Tsehaynesh Messele, Teri Roberts, Wendy Stevens, Ilesh Jani, Alash'le Abimiku, Nathan Ford and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Trevor PeterClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, MA, USA.
Dennis EllenbergerUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrea A KimUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Debrah BoerasUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tsehaynesh MesseleAfrican Society for Laboratory Medicine, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Teri RobertsMédecins Sans Frontières, Access Campaign, Geneva, Switzerland.
Wendy StevensUniversity of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ilesh JaniNational Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Alash'le AbimikuInstitute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nathan FordWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Zachary KatzClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, MA, USA.
John N NkengasongUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: jcn5@cdc.gov.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USClinton Health Access Initiative · USAfrican Society for Laboratory Medicine · ETMédecins Sans Frontières · CHNational Health Laboratory Service · ZAUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaling up access to HIV viral load testing for individuals undergoing antiretroviral therapy in low-resource settings is a global health priority, as emphasised by research showing the benefits of suppressed viral load for the individual and the whole population. Historically, large-scale diagnostic test implementation has been slow and incomplete because of service delivery and other challenges. Building on lessons from the past, in this Personal View we propose a new framework to accelerate viral load scale-up and ensure equitable access to this essential test. The framework includes the following steps: (1) ensuring adequate financial investment in scaling up this test; (2) achieving pricing agreements and consolidating procurement to lower prices of the test; (3) strengthening functional tiered laboratory networks and systems to expand access to reliable, high-quality testing across countries; (4) strengthening national leadership, with prioritisation of laboratory services; and (5) demand creation and uptake of test results by clinicians, nurses, and patients, which will be vital in ensuring viral load tests are appropriately used to improve the quality of care. The use of dried blood spots to stabilise and ship samples from clinics to laboratories, and the use of point-of-care diagnostic tests, will also be important for ensuring access, especially in settings with reduced laboratory capacity. For countries that have just started to scale up viral load testing, lessons can be learnt from countries such as Botswana, Brazil, South Africa, and Thailand, which have already established viral load programmes. This framework might be useful for guiding the implementation of viral load with the aim of achieving the new global HIV 90-90-90 goals by 2020.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveBloodDesiccationGlobal HealthHealth PolicyHIV InfectionsHumansMedical Laboratory SciencePoint-of-Care SystemsSpecimen HandlingViral LoadAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID27773596
PMCPMC5745573
OpenAlexW2538502600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.