Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27773531›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Recommendations about Pregnancy from Women with Mobility Disability to Their Peers.

Lisa I Iezzoni, Amy J Wint, Suzanne C Smeltzer, Jeffrey L Ecker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Spinal Cord Injuries: A Population-Based Study.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa I IezzoniMongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: liezzoni@mgh.harvard.edu.
Amy J WintMongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Suzanne C SmeltzerCenter for Nursing Research, Villanova University College of Nursing, Villanova, Pennsylvania.
Jeffrey L EckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USVillanova University · US

Funding

Pregnancy Experience of Women with Physical DisabilitiesR21HD068756 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI IEZZONI, LISA I. · 2012 to 2013
$469k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD068756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough growing numbers of women with mobility disability are becoming pregnant and desiring motherhood, relatively little is known about their pregnancy experiences or what they might recommend to other women with mobility disability contemplating pregnancy.

methodsUsing a semistructured, open-ended interview protocol, we conducted 2-hour telephone interviews with 22 women who had a significant mobility disability before becoming pregnant and had delivered babies within the prior 10 years. We recruited most interviewees through online social networks. We used NVivo software to sort interview transcript texts and performed conventional content analyses to identify major themes.

resultsParticipants' mean ± standard deviation age was 34.8 ± 5.3 years; most were White, well-educated, and middle income and 18 used wheeled mobility aids. Recommendations for other women with mobility disability coalesced around five themes: recognizing the possibility of giving birth, advocacy and support, being informed, approaches toward obstetrical practitioners, and managing fears about losing custody of their child. Lacking information about what to expect during their pregnancy was a significant problem. Women got information about pregnancy from diverse sources, but questions arose about accuracy and relevance of this information to individual circumstances. Women urged their peers to advocate for their preferences and needs with obstetrical practitioners.

conclusionsWomen with mobility disability who had delivered babies offered constructive advice for their peers who desire pregnancy. Increasing availability of accurate and relevant information about pregnancy among women with mobility disability is critically important, as is training obstetrical practitioners to provide patient-centered care to these women during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedObstetricsParturitionPeer GroupPersons with DisabilitiesPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeQualitative ResearchSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID27773531
PMCPMC5177507
OpenAlexW2537659155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.