ArticleIndian heart journal
CRUSADE bleeding score as a predictor of bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Zagazig University Hospital.
Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of the Left Main Coronary Artery: A Contemporary Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor based on the ABCD-GENE score in acute coronary syndrome patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- In-hospital mortality from acute coronary syndrome in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.SAGE open medicine · 2023Review
- Young mother with lupus and life-altering cardiocerebrovascular nightmare: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2022Article
- Association of Dephosphorylated-Uncarboxylated Matrix Gla Protein and Risk of Major Bleeding in Patients Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: A single-center registry study.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2019Article
- Comparison of ACUITY, CRUSADE, and GRACE Risk Scales for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2018Article
- CRUSADE Score is Superior to Platelet Function Testing for Prediction of Bleeding in Patients Following Coronary Interventions.EBioMedicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo examine the value of CRUSADE bleeding score in predicting bleeding events in our local patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Zagazig University Hospitals.
methodsOur study included 240 patients with ACS. They underwent history and clinical examination; 12-lead electrocardiography; echocardiography; troponin I, hematocrit value; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); application of CRUSADE score; and follow-up of the hospital stay and documentations of events. Patients were classified into two groups: Group I: patients with major bleeding, and Group II: patients without major bleeding.
resultsPatients with major bleeding were significantly older, with more diabetic and hypertensive patients, more prior vascular disease, heart failure, and less patients with unstable angina, higher heart rate and systolic blood, lower eGFR, and higher CRUSADE risk score. CRUSADE bleeding score was the strongest predictor of major bleeding. Sensitivity of CRUSADE score ≥33 in prediction of major bleeding in the whole study group was 80%, specificity was 73.4%, positive predictive value was 26.9%, negative predictive value was 96.9%, overall accuracy was 74.1%. Sensitivity of CRUSADE score ≥38.5 in prediction of major bleeding in the STEMI patients was 70%, specificity was 84.8%, positive predictive value was 50%, negative predictive value was 92.9%, and overall accuracy was 82.1%.
conclusionCRUSADE score is a good predictor for major bleeding in Egyptian patients with ACS. It is applicable in UA/NSTEMI as well as in STEMI patients and in women as well as in men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.