Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27773400›Full record

Observational studyIndian heart journal

Oral antiplatelet therapy and platelet inhibition: An experience from a tertiary care center.

Jamshed J Dalal, Aarti Digrajkar, Alap Gandhi

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of Clopidogrel, Prasugrel and Ticagrelor Response of Patients by PFA-100-Innovance Test Results.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamshed J DalalDirector - Centre for Cardiac Sciences, Kokilaben Hospital, Four Bungalows, Andheri, Mumbai 400053, India. Electronic address: jjdalal@hotmail.com.
Aarti DigrajkarClinical Assistant, Department of Cardiology, Kokilaben Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Alap GandhiMedical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Bangalore, India.
Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital · INAstraZeneca (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesAlthough clopidogrel combined with aspirin is the most commonly used dual drug combination to avert thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease, the poor responsiveness to clopidogrel remains a concern. The objective of the current study is to assess the extent of resistance to clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor in a real life set of patients with coronary artery disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 539 patients, who underwent PCI and were on aspirin and on any of the three drugs, namely, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor, were followed up regularly in the outpatient department. After 24h of initiation of antiplatelet medication, response to the treatment in all the patients was assessed using thrombelastography. The average percentage platelet inhibition was assessed along with the resistance and sensitivity to the drug in each patient. Sensitivity and resistance to the specific drug was defined as >50% and <50% of mean platelet inhibition, respectively.

resultsAbout 99.15% of the patients treated with ticagrelor were sensitive to the drug and the difference between ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and prasugrel groups for sensitivity was significant with a p value of 0.00001, in favor of ticagrelor. It was also found that ticagrelor was significantly (p value of 0.001) associated with least resistance as compared with the other drugs assessed in the study.

conclusionsUse of ticagrelor as dual therapy along with aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and undergoing PCI was associated with a significantly higher mean percentage platelet inhibition, higher sensitivity, and lower resistance as compared with the usage of clopidogrel or prasugrel.

Indexed as

Tertiary Care CentersAdenosineAdministration, OralClopidogrelCoronary Artery DiseaseDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug ResistanceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet CountPrasugrel HydrochlorideAdenosineClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochloridePurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsTicagrelorTiclopidineClopidogrelDrug resistancePercutaneous coronary interventionPrasugrelTicagrelor

Identifiers

PMID27773400
PMCPMC5079129
OpenAlexW2275397221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.